Literature DB >> 9035390

Temporal integration of loudness, loudness discrimination, and the form of the loudness function.

S Buus1, M Florentine, T Poulsen.   

Abstract

Temporal integration for loudness of 5-kHz tones was measured as a function of level between 2 and 60 dB SL. Absolute thresholds and levels required to produce equal loudness were measured for 2-, 10-, 50-, and 250-ms tones using adaptive, two-interval, two-alternative forced-choice procedures. The procedure for loudness balances was new and employed ten interleaved tracks to obtain concurrent measurements for ten tone pairs. Each track converged at the level required to make the variable stimulus just louder than the fixed stimulus. Thus, the data yield estimates of the just-noticeable difference (jnd) for loudness level and temporal integration for loudness. Results for four listeners show that the amount of temporal integration, defined as the level difference between equally loud short and long tones, varies markedly with level and is largest at moderate levels. The effect of level increases as the duration of the short stimulus decreases and is largest for comparisons between the 2- and 250-ms tones. The loudness-level jnds are also largest at moderate levels and, contrary to traditional jnds for the level of two equal-duration tones, they do not appear to depend on duration. The latter finding indicates that loudness discrimination between stimuli that differ along multiple dimensions is not the same as level discrimination between stimuli that differ only in level. An equal-loudness-ratio model, which assumes that the ratio of loudnesses for a long and short tone at equal SPL is the same at all SPLs, can explain the level dependence of temporal integration and the loudness jnds. It indicates that the loudness function [log(loudness) versus SPL] is flatter at moderate levels than at low and high levels in agreement with earlier findings for 1-kHz tones [M. Florentine et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 1633-1644 (1996)].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9035390     DOI: 10.1121/1.417959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Objective estimation of loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Estimating loudness growth from tone-burst evoked responses.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Synchronizing to real events: subjective audiovisual alignment scales with perceived auditory depth and speed of sound.

Authors:  David Alais; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Comparison of absolute thresholds derived from an adaptive forced-choice procedure and from reaction probabilities and reaction times in a simple reaction time paradigm.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Andreas Tiefenau; Hellmut von Specht
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-07-06

5.  Duration discrimination in the mouse (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Karin B Klink; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Sound identity is represented robustly in auditory cortex during perceptual constancy.

Authors:  Stephen M Town; Katherine C Wood; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Spectro-temporal weighting of loudness.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Wiebke Heeren; Jan Rennies; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Real-time loudness normalisation with combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.

Authors:  Dimitar Spirrov; Maaike Van Eeckhoutte; Lieselot Van Deun; Tom Francart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Harmonicity aids hearing in noise.

Authors:  Malinda J McPherson; River C Grace; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.157

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.