Literature DB >> 15480564

Changes in lung volume with three systems of endotracheal suctioning with and without pre-oxygenation in patients with mild-to-moderate lung failure.

Maria-del-Mar Fernández1, Enrique Piacentini, Lluis Blanch, Rafael Fernández.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in lung volume, oxygenation, airway pressure, and hemodynamic effects induced by suctioning with three systems in critically ill patients with mild-to-moderate lung disease, and also to evaluate the effects of hyperoxygenation applied prior to the maneuver as suggested by some guidelines.
DESIGN: Prospective crossover study.
SETTING: General intensive care department of a university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Ten mechanically ventilated patients with mild-to-moderate acute respiratory failure.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were ventilated in volume control mode with a mean tidal volume of 490+/-88 ml, PEEP 7+/-4 cmH2O and FiO(2) 0.36+/-0.05. Suctioning was performed sequentially with a quasi-closed system, with an open system 10 min later, and finally with a closed system. Thereafter, pure oxygen was applied for 2 min and the whole suctioning sequence was repeated in reverse order.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients' mean PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio was 273+/-28 mmHg. The reductions in lung volume during suctioning were similar with the quasi-closed (386+/-124 ml) and closed system (497+/-338 ml), but significantly higher with the open system (1281+/-656 ml, P=0.022). We found no significant hemodynamic adverse effects, and no significant SpO(2) reductions with all the studied suctioning techniques. Pre-oxygenation with pure oxygen did not induce additive effects in lung volume changes. With and without pre-oxygenation, lung volume returned to baseline in every patient within 10 min.
CONCLUSIONS: Suctioning with closed and quasi-closed systems reduces the substantial losses in lung volume observed with the open system. Nevertheless, in patients without severe lung disease these changes were transient and rapidly reversible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15480564     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-004-2458-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  19 in total

1.  Effects of tracheal suctioning on respiratory resistances in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  J Guglielminotti; J M Desmonts; B Dureuil
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Cardiac arrhythmias resulting from tracheal suctioning.

Authors:  C Shim; N Fine; R Fernandez; M H Williams
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Effects of suctioning on mucociliary transport.

Authors:  J F Landa; M A Kwoka; G A Chapman; M Brito; M A Sackner
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Roy G Brower; Michael A Matthay; Alan Morris; David Schoenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Arthur Wheeler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-05-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Prevention of endotracheal suctioning-induced alveolar derecruitment in acute lung injury.

Authors:  Salvatore M Maggiore; Francois Lellouche; Jerome Pigeot; Solenne Taille; Nicolas Deye; Xavier Durrmeyer; Jean-Christophe Richard; Jordi Mancebo; Francois Lemaire; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Evaluation of a closed-tracheal suction system.

Authors:  G C Carlon; S J Fox; N J Ackerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  The effects of oxygen and hyperinflation on arterial oxygen tension after endotracheal suctioning.

Authors:  S K Goodnough
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.210

8.  Dynamics of lung collapse and recruitment during prolonged breathing in porcine lung injury.

Authors:  P Neumann; J E Berglund; E Fernández Mondéjar; A Magnusson; G Hedenstierna
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1998-10

9.  New endotracheal tube adaptor reducing cardiopulmonary effects of suctioning.

Authors:  L Cabal; S Devaskar; B Siassi; C Plajstek; F Waffarn; C Blanco; J Hodgman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Effectiveness and side effects of closed and open suctioning: an experimental evaluation.

Authors:  Sophie Lindgren; Birgitta Almgren; Marieann Högman; Sven Lethvall; Erik Houltz; Stefan Lundin; Ola Stenqvist
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  13 in total

1.  A comparison of the effectiveness of open and closed endotracheal suction.

Authors:  Beverley Copnell; David G Tingay; Nicholas J Kiraly; Magdy Sourial; Michael J Gordon; John F Mills; Colin J Morley; Peter A Dargaville
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Comparison of the effects of two humidifier systems on endotracheal tube resistance.

Authors:  Indalecio Morán; Belén Cabello; Elizabeth Manero; Jordi Mancebo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Diaphragm electromyographic activity as a predictor of weaning failure.

Authors:  Martin Dres; Matthieu Schmidt; Alexis Ferre; Julien Mayaux; Thomas Similowski; Alexandre Demoule
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Gas exchange impairment induced by open suctioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome: impact of permissive hypercapnia.

Authors:  Maria Paula Caramez; Eriko Miyoshi; R Scott Harris; Robert M Kacmarek; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Tracheal suction by closed system without daily change versus open system.

Authors:  Leonardo Lorente; María Lecuona; Alejandro Jiménez; María L Mora; Antonio Sierra
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Comparing the effect of open and closed endotracheal suctioning on pain and oxygenation in post CABG patients under mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Ali Mohammadpour; Shahram Amini; Mohammad Taghi Shakeri; Sahereh Mirzaei
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

7.  The effect of the open and closed system suctions on cardiopulmonary parameters: time and costs in patients under mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Ali Afshari; Mahmoud Safari; Khodayar Oshvandi; Ali Reza Soltanian
Journal:  Nurs Midwifery Stud       Date:  2014-06-15

8.  Comparing two levels of closed system suction pressure in ICU patients: Evaluating the relative safety of higher values of suction pressure.

Authors:  Ahmad R Yazdannik; Somayeh Haghighat; Mahmoud Saghaei; Maryam Eghbali
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2013-03

9.  Acute effects of physiotherapeutic respiratory maneuvers in critically ill patients with craniocerebral trauma.

Authors:  Manoel Luiz de Cerqueira Neto; Álvaro Vieira Moura; Telma Cristina Fontes Cerqueira; Esperidião Elias Aquim; Álvaro Reá-Neto; Mirella Cristine Oliveira; Walderi Monteiro da Silva Júnior; Valter J Santana-Filho; Rosana Herminia Scola
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Automated vs. conventional ventilation in the ICU: a randomized controlled crossover trial comparing blood oxygen saturation during daily nursing procedures (I-NURSING).

Authors:  Jonathan Chelly; Sandie Mazerand; Sebastien Jochmans; Claire-Marie Weyer; Franck Pourcine; Olivier Ellrodt; Nathalie Thieulot-Rolin; Jean Serbource-Goguel; Oumar Sy; Ly Van Phach Vong; Mehran Monchi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.