Literature DB >> 17492268

A comparison of the effectiveness of open and closed endotracheal suction.

Beverley Copnell1, David G Tingay, Nicholas J Kiraly, Magdy Sourial, Michael J Gordon, John F Mills, Colin J Morley, Peter A Dargaville.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of open and closed endotracheal suction in recovering thin and thick secretions in normal and injured lungs during conventional and high frequency ventilation. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Randomised study in a paediatric intensive care model in the animal research laboratory of a tertiary paediatric hospital.
SUBJECTS: 16 New Zealand White rabbits.
INTERVENTIONS: Anaesthetised animals were intubated with a 3.5-mm endotracheal tube. Simulated thin and thick secretions (iopamidol 2 ml, a watery radio-opaque fluid, and fluorescent mucin 1 ml) were instilled in turn 1 cm below the tube tip through a catheter placed via a tracheostomy. Open or closed suction, randomly assigned, was applied for 6s at -140 mmHg using a 6-F gauge catheter. Following lung injury with repeated saline lavage the procedure was repeated on conventional and high frequency ventilation. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Iopamidol recovery was determined by digitally subtracting the post-contrast and post-suction radiographic images. Mucin recovery was determined by fluorescence assay of the aspirate. In the normal lung similar amounts were recovered by both suction methods. In the lavaged lung closed suction recovered less iopamidol during conventional (22 +/- 7.5%) and high frequency ventilation (11 +/- 2.4%) than open suction (36 +/- 2% and 22 +/- 8.1%, respectively). Mucin recovery was less with closed suction during conventional 32 +/- 28 microl) and high frequency ventilation (30 +/- 31 microl) than with open suction (382 +/- 235 microl and 24 +/- 153 microl).
CONCLUSIONS: In the injured lung closed suction was less effective than open suction at recovering thin and thick simulated secretions, irrespective of ventilation mode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17492268     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-007-0635-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  35 in total

1.  Closed tracheal suction systems: effectiveness and nursing implications.

Authors:  M L Noll; C D Hix; G Scott
Journal:  AACN Clin Issues Crit Care Nurs       Date:  1990-08

2.  Effects of a closed tracheal suction system on ventilatory and cardiovascular parameters.

Authors:  S A Harshbarger; L A Hoffman; T G Zullo; M R Pinsky
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  The practice and perception of intensive care staff using the closed suctioning system.

Authors:  B Blackwood
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Enhancement of the viscosity of mucin by serum albumin.

Authors:  S J List; B P Findlay; G G Forstner; J F Forstner
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1978-11-01       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Physiological responses to endotracheal and oral suctioning in paediatric patients: the influence of endotracheal tube sizes and suction pressures.

Authors:  N C Singh; N Kissoon; T Frewen; N Tiffin
Journal:  Clin Intensive Care       Date:  1991

6.  Effects of suctioning on mucociliary transport.

Authors:  J F Landa; M A Kwoka; G A Chapman; M Brito; M A Sackner
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Prevention of endotracheal suctioning-induced alveolar derecruitment in acute lung injury.

Authors:  Salvatore M Maggiore; Francois Lellouche; Jerome Pigeot; Solenne Taille; Nicolas Deye; Xavier Durrmeyer; Jean-Christophe Richard; Jordi Mancebo; Francois Lemaire; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 8.  Nursing and infection-control issues during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Sweeney; Joseph Lyle; Niall D Ferguson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Effect of tracheal suction on oxygenation, circulation, and lung mechanics in newborn infants.

Authors:  G Simbruner; H Coradello; M Fodor; L Havelec; G Lubec; A Pollak
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Comparison of loss in lung volume with open versus in-line catheter endotracheal suctioning.

Authors:  Karen Choong; Phornlert Chatrkaw; Helena Frndova; Peter N Cox
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.624

View more
  8 in total

1.  Electrical impedance tomography can rapidly detect small pneumothoraces in surfactant-depleted piglets.

Authors:  Risha Bhatia; Georg M Schmölzer; Peter G Davis; David G Tingay
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  A novel visual sputum suctioning system is useful for endotracheal suctioning in a dog model.

Authors:  Xun Liu; Huisheng Deng; Ziyang Huang; Bingbing Yan; Jingjing Lv; Jinxing Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

Review 3.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine, 2007. III. Ethics and legislation, health services research, pharmacology and toxicology, nutrition and paediatrics.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  The effect of endotracheal suction on regional tidal ventilation and end-expiratory lung volume.

Authors:  D G Tingay; B Copnell; C A Grant; P A Dargaville; K R Dunster; A Schibler
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Hyperinflation deteriorates arterial oxygenation and lung injury in a rabbit model of ARDS with repeated open endotracheal suctioning.

Authors:  Junko Kamiyama; Subrina Jesmin; Hideaki Sakuramoto; Nobutake Shimojyo; Majedul Islam; Keiichi Hagiya; Masato Sugano; Takeshi Unoki; Masami Oki; Satoru Kawano; Taro Mizutani
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Effects of Combined Tracheal Suctioning and Expiratory Pause: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Luciane de Fraga Gomes Martins; Wagner da Silva Naue; Amanda Soares Skueresky; Tanara Bianchi; Alexandre Simões Dias; Luiz Alberto Forgiarini
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-10

7.  Comparing two levels of closed system suction pressure in ICU patients: Evaluating the relative safety of higher values of suction pressure.

Authors:  Ahmad R Yazdannik; Somayeh Haghighat; Mahmoud Saghaei; Maryam Eghbali
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2013-03

8.  The practice of intensive care nurses using the closed suctioning system: An observational study.

Authors:  Somayeh Haghighat; AhmadReza Yazdannik
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.