Literature DB >> 15478411

Resonance frequency of microbubbles: effect of viscosity.

Damir B Khismatullin1.   

Abstract

The transmitted frequency at which a gas bubble of millimeter or submillimeter size oscillates resonantly in a low-viscosity liquid is approximately equal to the undamped natural frequency (referred to as the Minnaert frequency if surface tension effects are disregarded). Based on a theoretical analysis of bubble oscillation, this paper shows that such an approximation cannot be validated for microbubbles used in contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging. The contrast-agent microbubbles represent either encapsulated bubbles of size less than 10 microm or free (nonencapsulated) bubbles of submicron size. The resonance frequency of the microbubbles deviates significantly from the undamped natural frequency over the whole range of microbubble sizes due to the increased viscous damping coefficient. The difference between these two frequencies is shown to have a tremendous impact on the resonant backscatter by the microbubbles. In particular, the first and second harmonics of the backscattered signal from the microbubbles are characterized by their own resonance frequencies, equal to neither the microbubble resonance frequency nor the undamped natural frequency.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15478411     DOI: 10.1121/1.1778835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  High-frequency dynamics of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Dustin E Kruse; Paul A Dayton; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  The natural frequency of nonlinear oscillation of ultrasound contrast agents in microvessels.

Authors:  Shengping Qin; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Wave scattering from encapsulated microbubbles subject to high-frequency ultrasound: contribution of higher-order scattering modes.

Authors:  Jiusheng Chen; Kendall S Hunter; Robin Shandas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Production of uniformly sized serum albumin and dextrose microbubbles.

Authors:  Michael J Borrelli; William D O'Brien; Laura J Bernock; Heather R Williams; Eric Hamilton; Jonah Wu; Michael L Oelze; William C Culp
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 7.491

5.  Breakup of finite thickness viscous shell microbubbles by ultrasound: a simplified zero-thickness shell model.

Authors:  Chao-Tsung Hsiao; Georges L Chahine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Acoustic response of compliable microvessels containing ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Shengping Qin; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Advances in molecular imaging with ultrasound.

Authors:  Ryan Gessner; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.488

8.  Characterization of Bioeffects on Endothelial Cells under Acoustic Droplet Vaporization.

Authors:  Robinson Seda; David S Li; J Brian Fowlkes; Joseph L Bull
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Influences of microbubble diameter and ultrasonic parameters on in vitro sonothrombolysis efficacy.

Authors:  Michael J Borrelli; William D O'Brien; Eric Hamilton; Michael L Oelze; Jonah Wu; Laura J Bernock; Stephen Tung; Husein Rokadia; William C Culp
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  Molecular Acoustic Angiography: A New Technique for High-resolution Superharmonic Ultrasound Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  Sarah E Shelton; Brooks D Lindsey; James K Tsuruta; F Stuart Foster; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.