Literature DB >> 23106936

Influences of microbubble diameter and ultrasonic parameters on in vitro sonothrombolysis efficacy.

Michael J Borrelli1, William D O'Brien, Eric Hamilton, Michael L Oelze, Jonah Wu, Laura J Bernock, Stephen Tung, Husein Rokadia, William C Culp.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify the effects of microbubble (MB) size, elasticity, and pulsed ultrasonic parameters on in vitro sonothrombolysis (ultrasound [US]-mediated thrombolysis) efficacy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monodispersive MBs with diameters of 1 μm or 3 μm were exposed to pulsed US (1 MHz or 3 MHz) to lyse rabbit blood clots. Sonothrombolysis efficacy (clot mass loss) was measured as functions of MB size and concentration, ultrasonic frequency and intensity, pulse duration (PD), pulse repeat frequency (PRF), and duty factor.
RESULTS: Sonothrombolysis at 1 MHz was more effective using 3-μm MBs and at 3 MHz using 1-μm MBs. Sonothrombolysis was more effective at 1 MHz when≥75% of MBs remained intact, especially for 3-μm MBs; improving sonothrombolysis by increasing PRF from 100 Hz to 400 Hz at 3 MHz was associated with increasing 3-μm MB survival. However, 60% of 1-μm MBs were destroyed during maximal sonothrombolysis at 3 MHz, indicating that considerable MB collapse may be required for sonothrombolysis under these conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: The ability to control MB size and elasticity permits using a wide range of US parameters (eg, frequency, intensity) to produce desired levels of sonothrombolysis. Comparable, maximal sonothrombolysis efficacy was achieved at 20-fold lower intensity with 3-μm MBs (0.1W/cm(2)) than with 1-μm MBs (2.0W/cm(2)), a potential safety issue for in vivo sonothrombolysis. US parameters that maximized MB survival yielded maximal sonothrombolysis efficacy except with 1-μm MBs at 3MHz where most MBs were destroyed.
Copyright © 2012 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23106936      PMCID: PMC3508303          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  45 in total

1.  Microbubble administration accelerates clot lysis during continuous 2-MHz ultrasound monitoring in stroke patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator.

Authors:  Carlos A Molina; Marc Ribo; Marta Rubiera; Joan Montaner; Esteban Santamarina; Raquel Delgado-Mederos; Juan F Arenillas; Rafael Huertas; Francisco Purroy; Pilar Delgado; José Alvarez-Sabín
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals.

Authors:  Azzdine Y Ammi; Robin O Cleveland; Jonathan Mamou; Grace I Wang; S Lori Bridal; William D O'Brien
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Modeling of nonlinear viscous stress in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Jillian F Haac; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Microbubble potentiated ultrasound as a method of declotting thrombosed dialysis grafts: experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  W C Culp; T R Porter; F Xie; T C Goertzen; T C McCowan; B N Vonk; B T Baxter
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  High rate of recanalization of middle cerebral artery occlusion during 2-MHz transcranial color-coded Doppler continuous monitoring without thrombolytic drug.

Authors:  Pascal Cintas; Anne Pavy Le Traon; Vincent Larrue
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Microbubbles improve sonothrombolysis in vitro and decrease hemorrhage in vivo in a rabbit stroke model.

Authors:  Aliza T Brown; Rene Flores; Eric Hamilton; Paula K Roberson; Michael J Borrelli; William C Culp
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Fibrin-targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles for targeted thrombolysis.

Authors:  J N Marsh; A Senpan; G Hu; M J Scott; P J Gaffney; S A Wickline; G M Lanza
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.307

8.  Ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis with tPA-loaded echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  George J Shaw; Jason M Meunier; Shao-Ling Huang; Christopher J Lindsell; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.944

9.  Effect of ultrasound on thrombolysis of middle cerebral artery occlusion.

Authors:  Jürgen Eggers; Björn Koch; Karsten Meyer; Inke König; Günter Seidel
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Ultrasound enhanced prehospital thrombolysis using microbubbles infusion in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the Sonolysis study.

Authors:  Jeroen Slikkerveer; Pieter A Dijkmans; Gertjan T Sieswerda; Pieter A F M Doevendans; Arie P J van Dijk; Freek W A Verheugt; Thomas R Porter; Otto Kamp
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Sonothrombolysis.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Guillaume Bouchoux; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Shaken and stirred: mechanisms of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Matthew J Gruber; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Guided longer pulses from a diagnostic ultrasound and intraclot microbubble enhanced catheter-directed thrombolysis in vivo.

Authors:  Shunji Gao; Qiong Zhu; Xiaoxiao Dong; Zhong Chen; Zheng Liu; Feng Xie
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption for targeted drug delivery in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Muna Aryal; Costas D Arvanitis; Phillip M Alexander; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  Efficacy of Sonothrombolysis Using Microbubbles Produced by a Catheter-Based Microfluidic Device in a Rat Model of Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Adam J Dixon; Jun Li; John-Marschner Robert Rickel; Alexander L Klibanov; Zhiyi Zuo; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  In Vitro Sonothrombolysis Enhancement by Transiently Stable Microbubbles Produced by a Flow-Focusing Microfluidic Device.

Authors:  Adam J Dixon; John Marschner Robert Rickel; Brian D Shin; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Fluid Viscosity Affects the Fragmentation and Inertial Cavitation Threshold of Lipid-Encapsulated Microbubbles.

Authors:  Brandon Helfield; John J Black; Bin Qin; John Pacella; Xucai Chen; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  In-vitro sonothrombolysis using thick-shelled polymer microbubbles - a comparison with thin-shelled microbubbles.

Authors:  Jovana Janjic; Malin K Larsson; Anna Bjällmark
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.062

9.  Ultrasound Mediated Microbubbles Destruction Augmented Sonolysis: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Hai Cui; Qiong Zhu; Yunhua Gao; Hongmei Xia; Kaibin Tan; Ying He; Zheng Liu; Yali Xu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.