Literature DB >> 15470784

Human genetic banking: altruism, benefit and consent.

Garrath Williams1, Doris Schroeder.   

Abstract

This article considers how we should frame the ethical issues raised by current proposals for large-scale genebanks with on-going links to medical and lifestyle data, such as the Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council's 'UK Biobank'. As recent scandals such as Alder Hey have emphasised, there are complex issues concerning the informed consent of donors that need to be carefully considered. However, we believe that a preoccupation with informed consent obscures important questions about the purposes to which such collections are put, not least that they may be only haphazardly used for research (especially that of commercial interest)--an end that would not fairly reflect the original altruistic motivation of donors, and the trust they must invest. We therefore argue that custodians of such databases take on a weighty pro-active duty, to encourage public debate about the ends of such collections and to sponsor research that reflects publicly agreed priorities and provides public benefits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15470784     DOI: 10.1080/1463677042000189598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Genet Soc        ISSN: 1463-6778


  11 in total

1.  Sharing the benefits of genetic research.

Authors:  Doris Schroeder; Miltos Ladikas; Udo Schuklenk; Carolina Lasén Lasén Diáz; Anita Kleinsmidt; Fatima Alvarez-Castillo; Dafna Feinholz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-10

2.  Benefit sharing: it's time for a definition.

Authors:  D Schroeder
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Biological sample collections from minors for genetic research: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers.

Authors:  Kristien Hens; Herman Nys; Jean-Jacques Cassiman; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  A comprehensive information database (CID) of breast cancer patients in China.

Authors:  Shuai Li; Li Fu
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  Informed consent in genomics and genetic research.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 8.929

6.  Withdrawal from biobank research: considerations and the way forward.

Authors:  Kristina Hug; Göran Hermerén; Mats Johansson
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.739

7.  Research understanding, attitude and awareness towards biobanking: a survey among Italian twin participants to a genetic epidemiological study.

Authors:  Virgilia Toccaceli; Corrado Fagnani; Lorenza Nisticò; Cristina D'Ippolito; Lorenzo Giannantonio; Sonia Brescianini; Maria Antonietta Stazi
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Incorporating exclusion clauses into informed consent for biobanking.

Authors:  Zubin Master; David B Resnik
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Participant characteristics that influence consent for genetic research in a population-based survey: the Baltimore epidemiologic catchment area follow-up.

Authors:  Briana Mezuk; William W Eaton; Peter Zandi
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2008-03-26

Review 10.  Ethical aspects of human biobanks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Danijela Budimir; Ozren Polasek; Ana Marusić; Ivana Kolcić; Tatijana Zemunik; Vesna Boraska; Ana Jeroncić; Mladen Boban; Harry Campbell; Igor Rudan
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.351

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.