Literature DB >> 11331939

Nonrandom segregation during meiosis: the unfairness of females.

F Pardo-Manuel de Villena1, C Sapienza.   

Abstract

Most geneticists assume that chromosome segregation during meiosis is Mendelian (i.e., each allele at each locus is represented equally in the gametes). The great majority of reports that discuss non-Mendelian transmission have focused on systems of gametic selection, such as the mouse t-haplotype and Segregation distorter in Drosophila, or on systems in which post-fertilization selection takes place. Because the segregation of chromosomes in such systems is Mendelian and unequal representation of alleles among offspring is achieved through gamete dysfunction or embryonic death, there is a common perception that true disturbances in the randomness of chromosome segregation are rare and of limited biological significance. In this review we summarize data on nonrandom segregation in a wide variety of genetic systems. Despite apparent differences between some systems, the basic requirements for nonrandom segregation can be deduced from their shared characteristics: i) asymmetrical meiotic division(s); ii) functional asymmetry of the meiotic spindle poles; and iii) functional heterozygosity at a locus that mediates attachment of a chromosome to the spindle. The frequency with which all three of these requirements are fulfilled in natural populations is unknown, but our analyses indicate that nonrandom segregation occurs with sufficient frequency during female meiosis, and in exceptional cases of male meiosis, that it has important biological, clinical, and evolutionary consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11331939     DOI: 10.1007/s003350040003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   2.957


  89 in total

Review 1.  Breaking Symmetry - Asymmetric Histone Inheritance in Stem Cells.

Authors:  Jing Xie; Matthew Wooten; Vuong Tran; Xin Chen
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 20.808

2.  Scrambling eggs: meiotic drive and the evolution of female recombination rates.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  The role of meiotic drive in hybrid male sterility.

Authors:  Shannon R McDermott; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Prevalence of B chromosomes in Orthoptera is associated with shape and number of A chromosomes.

Authors:  Brian G Palestis; Josefa Cabrero; Robert Trivers; Juan Pedro M Camacho
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 5.  Back to the roots: segregation of univalent sex chromosomes in meiosis.

Authors:  Gunar Fabig; Thomas Müller-Reichert; Leocadia V Paliulis
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Analysis of case-parent trios for imprinting effect using a loglinear model with adjustment for sex-of-parent-specific transmission ratio distortion.

Authors:  Lam Opal Huang; Claire Infante-Rivard; Aurélie Labbe
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Centromere-associated meiotic drive and female fitness variation in Mimulus.

Authors:  Lila Fishman; John K Kelly
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Inter-chromosomal level of genome organization and longevity-related phenotypes in humans.

Authors:  Alexander M Kulminski; Irina Culminskaya; Anatoli I Yashin
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2012-01-27

9.  Maternal transmission ratio distortion at the mouse Om locus results from meiotic drive at the second meiotic division.

Authors:  Guangming Wu; Lanping Hao; Zhiming Han; Shaorong Gao; Keith E Latham; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Carmen Sapienza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Evidence for extensive transmission distortion in the human genome.

Authors:  Sebastian Zöllner; Xiaoquan Wen; Neil A Hanchard; Mark A Herbert; Carole Ober; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.