Literature DB >> 15462138

Toxicity reduction evaluation, toxicity identification evaluation and toxicity tracking in direct toxicity assessment.

Matt Hutchings1, Ian Johnson, Elaine Hayes, Andrew E Girling, John Thain, Kevin Thomas, Rachel Benstead, Graham Whale, Joy Wordon, Ruth Maddox, Phillip Chown.   

Abstract

Toxicity reduction evaluations (TREs) in the River Esk and Lower Tees Estuary were based on the approach described by USEPA, but adapted to tackle the specific problems of the two sites. A combination of toxicity tracking and toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) was used at both locations to enhance the understanding of source and type of toxicants present. The assessment of toxicity at Langholm focussed on pesticides present in the sewerage network. The TIE programme indicated that the most likely toxic agents within the effluent were the organophosphate pesticides diazinon and to lesser extent propetamphos, although these did not account for all of the observed toxicity. The exact source of these toxicants was not clear although toxicity tracking identified two potential candidates. The TRE undertaken on the discharge to the lower Tees utilised high-throughput methods with standard test organisms to generate toxicity information throughout a complex sewerage network. The toxicity tracking information was used in conjunction with TIEs to identify a number of key sources of toxicity. Substantial toxicity was associated with a currently untreated industrial effluent. Chemical analysis and TIE highlighted cyanide as the likely toxicant in this effluent and its possible significance in the final discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15462138     DOI: 10.1023/b:ectx.0000035297.90620.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  1 in total

1.  Acute toxicity, bioconcentration, and persistence of AC 222,705, benthiocarb, chlorpyrifos, fenvalerate, methyl parathion, and permethrin in the estuarine environment.

Authors:  S C Schimmel; R L Garnas; J M Patrick; J C Moore
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.279

  1 in total
  7 in total

1.  Estimating spatial patterns of effluent exposure concentrations in direct toxicity assessment studies.

Authors:  Andrew E Girling; Andrew M Riddle; George M Mitchell; Philip K Chown; Derek Tinsley; Clare Buckler; Ian Johnson; Rachel Benstead
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Finding biomarkers is getting easier.

Authors:  Brian Patrick Bradley
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Ecotoxicity of raw and treated effluents generated by a veterinary pharmaceutical company: a comparison of the sensitivities of different standardized tests.

Authors:  Bianca de S Maselli; Luis A V Luna; Joice de O Palmeira; Karla P Tavares; Sandro Barbosa; Luiz A Beijo; Gisela A Umbuzeiro; Fábio Kummrow
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Risk characterisation in direct toxicity assessment of the River Esk and the Tees Estuary.

Authors:  Mark Crane; Albania Grosso; Paul Whitehouse; David Forrow
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Managing complex mixtures of chemicals--a forward look from the regulators' perspective.

Authors:  Jim Wharfe; Derek Tinsley; Mark Crane
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 6.  Bioassay selection, experimental design and quality control/assurance for use in effluent assessment and control.

Authors:  Ian Johnson; Matt Hutchings; Rachel Benstead; John Thain; Paul Whitehouse
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 7.  The use of direct toxicity assessment in the assessment and control of complex effluents in the UK: a demonstration programme.

Authors:  Derek Tinsley; Jim Wharfe; David Campbell; Phillip Chown; David Taylor; John Upton; Colin Taylor
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.