Literature DB >> 15462136

Estimating spatial patterns of effluent exposure concentrations in direct toxicity assessment studies.

Andrew E Girling1, Andrew M Riddle, George M Mitchell, Philip K Chown, Derek Tinsley, Clare Buckler, Ian Johnson, Rachel Benstead.   

Abstract

Hydrodynamic models of differing scale and complexity were used to estimate spatial patterns of effluent concentration in discharge plumes in the River Esk and the Lower Tees Estuary. The output from the Tees model was used, in conjunction with measurements of toxicity determined in short-term oyster embryo tests, to predict contours/zones of toxicity in the estuary associated with effluent discharges from four chemical processing sites. One of the discharges also combined the input from a municipal sewage treatment works. The models appeared to be effective in predicting patterns of dilution and dispersion of the effluent discharges in the respective receiving environments. Confirmation of the predictive capabilities of the Tees model was achieved by comparing predicted and measured toxicity in different regions of the plumes associated with the four discharges. Differences between predicted and measured toxicity for two of the four discharges were explicable in terms of failure to take account of the effects of real-time wind conditions when test samples were collected or overlap of adjacent discharge plumes. Suggested refinements to the models and measurement of effluent toxicity would further enhance the utility of this approach for determining the extent and significance of the effects of effluent discharges in receiving environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15462136     DOI: 10.1023/b:ectx.0000035295.97557.6b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  3 in total

1.  Derivation of predicted No-effect concentrations for lindane, 3, 4-dichloroaniline, atrazine, and copper.

Authors:  A E Girling; L Tattersfield; G C Mitchell; N O Crossland; D Pascoe; S J Blockwell; S J Maund; E J Taylor; A Wenzel; C R Janssen; I Jüttner
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  International trends in bioassay use for effluent management.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Power; Ruth S Boumphrey
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Toxicity reduction evaluation, toxicity identification evaluation and toxicity tracking in direct toxicity assessment.

Authors:  Matt Hutchings; Ian Johnson; Elaine Hayes; Andrew E Girling; John Thain; Kevin Thomas; Rachel Benstead; Graham Whale; Joy Wordon; Ruth Maddox; Phillip Chown
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Risk characterisation in direct toxicity assessment of the River Esk and the Tees Estuary.

Authors:  Mark Crane; Albania Grosso; Paul Whitehouse; David Forrow
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Managing complex mixtures of chemicals--a forward look from the regulators' perspective.

Authors:  Jim Wharfe; Derek Tinsley; Mark Crane
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  Bioassay selection, experimental design and quality control/assurance for use in effluent assessment and control.

Authors:  Ian Johnson; Matt Hutchings; Rachel Benstead; John Thain; Paul Whitehouse
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 4.  The use of direct toxicity assessment in the assessment and control of complex effluents in the UK: a demonstration programme.

Authors:  Derek Tinsley; Jim Wharfe; David Campbell; Phillip Chown; David Taylor; John Upton; Colin Taylor
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.