Literature DB >> 15462135

Bioassay selection, experimental design and quality control/assurance for use in effluent assessment and control.

Ian Johnson1, Matt Hutchings, Rachel Benstead, John Thain, Paul Whitehouse.   

Abstract

In the UK Direct Toxicity Assessment Programme, carried out in 1998-2000, a series of internationally recognised short-term toxicity test methods for algae, invertebrates and fishes, and rapid methods (ECLOX and Microtox) were used extensively. Abbreviated versions of conventional tests (algal growth inhibition tests, Daphnia magna immobilisation test and the oyster embryo-larval development test) were valuable for toxicity screening of effluent discharges and the identification of causes and sources of toxicity. Rapid methods based on chemiluminescence and bioluminescence were not generally useful in this programme, but may have a role where the rapid test has been shown to be an acceptable surrogate for a standardised test method. A range of quality assurance and control measures were identified. Requirements for quality control/assurance are most stringent when deriving data for characterising the toxic hazards of effluents and monitoring compliance against a toxicity reduction target. Lower quality control/assurance requirements can be applied to discharge screening and the identification of causes and sources of toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15462135     DOI: 10.1023/b:ectx.0000035294.15964.9a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  2 in total

1.  Estimating spatial patterns of effluent exposure concentrations in direct toxicity assessment studies.

Authors:  Andrew E Girling; Andrew M Riddle; George M Mitchell; Philip K Chown; Derek Tinsley; Clare Buckler; Ian Johnson; Rachel Benstead
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Toxicity reduction evaluation, toxicity identification evaluation and toxicity tracking in direct toxicity assessment.

Authors:  Matt Hutchings; Ian Johnson; Elaine Hayes; Andrew E Girling; John Thain; Kevin Thomas; Rachel Benstead; Graham Whale; Joy Wordon; Ruth Maddox; Phillip Chown
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

  2 in total
  6 in total

1.  International trends in bioassay use for effluent management.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Power; Ruth S Boumphrey
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Hazardous chemicals in complex mixtures--a role for direct toxicity assessment.

Authors:  Jim Wharfe
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Toxicity evaluation of natural samples from the vicinity of rice fields using two trophic levels.

Authors:  Catarina R Marques; Ruth Pereira; Fernando Gonçalves
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Ecotoxicological assessment of effluents in the Basque country (Northern Spain) by acute and chronic toxicity tests using Daphnia magna straus.

Authors:  Pilar Rodriguez; Maite Martinez-Madrid; Adolfo Cid
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Risk characterisation in direct toxicity assessment of the River Esk and the Tees Estuary.

Authors:  Mark Crane; Albania Grosso; Paul Whitehouse; David Forrow
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Managing complex mixtures of chemicals--a forward look from the regulators' perspective.

Authors:  Jim Wharfe; Derek Tinsley; Mark Crane
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.