Literature DB >> 15462134

The use of direct toxicity assessment in the assessment and control of complex effluents in the UK: a demonstration programme.

Derek Tinsley1, Jim Wharfe, David Campbell, Phillip Chown, David Taylor, John Upton, Colin Taylor.   

Abstract

This paper outlines the background, objectives, methodology, findings, outputs and recommendations from the Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme. This was a trial of a suite of bioassay methods and a seven-step protocol designed to deliver water quality improvements in catchments with well-defined water quality problems, where ecotoxicity from effluents was a contributing factor. The trial was run as a collaborative venture between the environmental regulators and water and manufacturing industries in the UK and was conducted at three project sites: -a reach of the river Aire near the city of Bradford in Yorkshire; -a reach of the River Esk near the town of Langholm on the border between Scotland and England; and -the lower Tees estuary on the north-east coast of England. The outcomes of each project are summarised in this paper. The learning points delivered by the programme were used to make recommendations to the regulators on how best to use bioassays for the assessment and control of complex effluents in the UK. Guidance was provided on how to carry out the bioassays and on how to use the data generated for regulatory decision-making. The programme also demonstrated how the regulators and the regulated can successfully work together to tackle environmental issues and deliver effective and workable solutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15462134     DOI: 10.1023/b:ectx.0000035293.45360.f6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  6 in total

1.  International trends in bioassay use for effluent management.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Power; Ruth S Boumphrey
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Hazardous chemicals in complex mixtures--a role for direct toxicity assessment.

Authors:  Jim Wharfe
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Estimating spatial patterns of effluent exposure concentrations in direct toxicity assessment studies.

Authors:  Andrew E Girling; Andrew M Riddle; George M Mitchell; Philip K Chown; Derek Tinsley; Clare Buckler; Ian Johnson; Rachel Benstead
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Risk characterisation in direct toxicity assessment of the River Esk and the Tees Estuary.

Authors:  Mark Crane; Albania Grosso; Paul Whitehouse; David Forrow
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Toxicity reduction evaluation, toxicity identification evaluation and toxicity tracking in direct toxicity assessment.

Authors:  Matt Hutchings; Ian Johnson; Elaine Hayes; Andrew E Girling; John Thain; Kevin Thomas; Rachel Benstead; Graham Whale; Joy Wordon; Ruth Maddox; Phillip Chown
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  A regulatory framework for controlling effluent discharges using toxicity testing in the UK.

Authors:  Paul Whitehouse; Ian Johnson; David M Forrow; Christopher Chubb
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

  6 in total
  9 in total

1.  International trends in bioassay use for effluent management.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Power; Ruth S Boumphrey
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Hazardous chemicals in complex mixtures--a role for direct toxicity assessment.

Authors:  Jim Wharfe
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  Finding biomarkers is getting easier.

Authors:  Brian Patrick Bradley
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Ecotoxicological assessment of effluents in the Basque country (Northern Spain) by acute and chronic toxicity tests using Daphnia magna straus.

Authors:  Pilar Rodriguez; Maite Martinez-Madrid; Adolfo Cid
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  The relationship between whole effluent toxicity (WET) and chemical-based effluent quality assessment in Vojvodina (Serbia).

Authors:  Ivana Teodorović; Milena Becelić; Ivana Planojević; Ivana Ivancev-Tumbas; Bozo Dalmacija
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Risk characterisation in direct toxicity assessment of the River Esk and the Tees Estuary.

Authors:  Mark Crane; Albania Grosso; Paul Whitehouse; David Forrow
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Managing complex mixtures of chemicals--a forward look from the regulators' perspective.

Authors:  Jim Wharfe; Derek Tinsley; Mark Crane
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Chemical, biological, and ecotoxicological assessment of pesticides and persistent organic pollutants in the Bahlui River, Romania.

Authors:  Mariana Neamtu; Ioan M Ciumasu; Naela Costica; Mihai Costica; Magda Bobu; Mircea N Nicoara; Cezar Catrinescu; Kristin Becker van Slooten; Luiz F De Alencastro
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Profiling the biological effects of wastewater samples via bioluminescent bacterial biosensors combined with estrogenic assays.

Authors:  Ingrid Bazin; Ho Bin Seo; Carey M Suehs; Marc Ramuz; Michel De Waard; Man Bock Gu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.223

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.