Literature DB >> 17535462

Memory for curvature of objects: haptic touch vs. vision.

Miriam Ittyerah1, Lawrence E Marks.   

Abstract

The present study examined the role of vision and haptics in memory for stimulus objects that vary along the dimension of curvature. Experiment 1 measured haptic-haptic (T-T) and haptic-visual (T-V) discrimination of curvature in a short-term memory paradigm, using 30-second retention intervals containing five different interpolated tasks. Results showed poorest performance when the interpolated tasks required spatial processing or movement, thereby suggesting that haptic information about shape is encoded in a spatial-motor representation. Experiment 2 compared visual-visual (V-V) and visual-haptic (V-T) short-term memory, again using 30-second delay intervals. The results of the ANOVA failed to show a significant effect of intervening activity. Intra-modal visual performance and cross-modal performance were similar. Comparing the four modality conditions (inter-modal V-T, T-V; intra-modal V-V, T-T, by combining the data of Experiments 1 and 2), in a global analysis, showed a reliable interaction between intervening activity and experiment (modality). Although there appears to be a general tendency for spatial and movement activities to exert the most deleterious effects overall, the patterns are not identical when the initial stimulus is encoded haptically (Experiment 1) and visually (Experiment 2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17535462      PMCID: PMC2258210          DOI: 10.1348/000712606X171531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  40 in total

1.  Similar mechanisms underlie curvature comparison by static and dynamic touch.

Authors:  S C Pont; A M Kappers; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-07

2.  The perception and recognition of natural object shape from deforming and static shadows.

Authors:  J F Norman; T E Dawson; S R Raines
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  The influence of stimulus tilt on haptic curvature matching and discrimination by dynamic touch.

Authors:  S C Pont; A M Kappers; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Haptic detection thresholds of Gaussian profiles over the whole range of spatial scales.

Authors:  S Louw; A M Kappers; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  VISION AND TOUCH: AN EXPERIMENTALLY CREATED CONFLICT BETWEEN THE TWO SENSES.

Authors:  I ROCK; J VICTOR
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  PLASTICITY IN HUMAN SENSORIMOTOR CONTROL.

Authors:  R HELD; S J FREEDMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  SOME SPECULATIONS CONCERNING THE LAG BETWEEN PERCEIVING AND PERFORMING.

Authors:  E E MACCOBY; H L BEE
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1965-06

8.  Observations on active touch.

Authors:  J J GIBSON
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-11       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Short-term retention of individual verbal items.

Authors:  L R PETERSON; M J PETERSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-09

10.  What aspects of vision facilitate haptic processing?

Authors:  Susanna Millar; Zainab Al-Attar
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 2.310

View more
  2 in total

1.  Intramodal and cross-modal discrimination of curvature: Haptic touch versus vision.

Authors:  Miriam Ittyerah; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Curr Psychol Lett       Date:  2008

Review 2.  The contributions of vision and haptics to reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.