Literature DB >> 15454910

Patients' reports of health care practitioner interventions that are related to communication during mechanical ventilation.

Lance Patak1, Anna Gawlinski, Ng Irene Fung, Lynn Doering, Jill Berg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The literature supports nursing interventions to maximize communication in mechanically ventilated patients, yet limited research exists on patients' perceptions of the helpfulness of health care practitioner interventions to enhance communication. In addition, the level of frustration experienced by these patients has not been reported. Thus, further research is necessary to examine patients' perspectives of the helpfulness of health care practitioner interventions that enhance communication of the mechanically ventilated patient.
OBJECTIVES: This study describes the level of frustration experienced by mechanically ventilated patients and ascertains the helpfulness of methods used by health care practitioners to meet the communication needs of the mechanically ventilated patient.
METHODS: A total of 29 critically ill patients, extubated within the last 72 hours, were included in this descriptive study using qualitative and quantitative methods. Subjects participated in an average 30-minute audiotaped interview session consisting of questions pertinent to their perceived level of frustration in communicating and the interventions practitioners used to meet their communication needs. Transcripts were analyzed by question and for overall themes.
RESULTS: It was found that 62% of patients (n = 18) reported a high level of frustration in communicating their needs while being mechanically ventilated. There was no significant difference between the duration of intubation and the level of frustration (Spearman r =.109, P =.573) or between the diagnosis and the level of frustration (P =.932). Patients who received anxiolytics (n = 23, 79% of the sample) had a lower level of frustration (mean 3.26) than those who did not receive anxiolytics (n = 6, 21% of the sample, mean 4.33). This difference trended toward significance (P =.084). Patients cited health care practitioner behaviors, characteristics, and attributes that both facilitated communication (kind, informative, and physically present at the bedside) and impeded their ability to communicate (mechanical, inattentive, and "absent" from the bedside). Patients reported problems and stresses associated with communication difficulties that can be alleviated by the health care practitioner.
CONCLUSIONS: Mechanically ventilated patients experience a high level of frustration when communicating their needs, and health care providers have a significant impact on the mechanically ventilated patient's experience. Further research is needed to explore and measure methods of facilitating communication that increase patient satisfaction, reduce patient anxiety, and obtain optimal pain management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15454910     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2004.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung        ISSN: 0147-9563            Impact factor:   2.210


  26 in total

1.  Use of augmentative and alternative communication strategies by family members in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Lauren M Broyles; Judith A Tate; Mary Beth Happ
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Silence is not golden.

Authors:  Mary Beth Happ; Brooke Paull
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.361

3.  The number of mechanically ventilated ICU patients meeting communication criteria.

Authors:  Mary Beth Happ; Jennifer B Seaman; Marci L Nilsen; Andrea Sciulli; Judith A Tate; Melissa Saul; Amber E Barnato
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  "Not being able to talk was horrid": A descriptive, correlational study of communication during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Jill L Guttormson; Karin Lindstrom Bremer; Rachel M Jones
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.072

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Patient and Caregiver Experiences with a Tracheostomy.

Authors:  Ivana Nakarada-Kordic; Niamh Patterson; Jill Wrapson; Stephen D Reay
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  The cost of not addressing the communication barriers faced by hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Richard R Hurtig; Rebecca M Alper; Benjamin Berkowitz
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2018-01

7.  Nurse-patient communication interactions in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Mary Beth Happ; Kathryn Garrett; Dana DiVirgilio Thomas; Judith Tate; Elisabeth George; Martin Houze; Jill Radtke; Susan Sereika
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 8.  Symptom identification in the chronically critically ill.

Authors:  Grace B Campbell; Mary Beth Happ
Journal:  AACN Adv Crit Care       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

9.  Enhancing the Communication of Suddenly Speechless Critical Care Patients.

Authors:  Carmen S Rodriguez; Meredeth Rowe; Loris Thomas; Jonathan Shuster; Brent Koeppel; Paula Cairns
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.228

10.  A Novel Picture Guide to Improve Spiritual Care and Reduce Anxiety in Mechanically Ventilated Adults in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Joel N Berning; Armeen D Poor; Sarah M Buckley; Komal R Patel; David J Lederer; Nathan E Goldstein; Daniel Brodie; Matthew R Baldwin
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.