Literature DB >> 25261939

The number of mechanically ventilated ICU patients meeting communication criteria.

Mary Beth Happ1, Jennifer B Seaman2, Marci L Nilsen2, Andrea Sciulli2, Judith A Tate3, Melissa Saul4, Amber E Barnato5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: (1) Estimate the proportion of mechanically ventilated (MV) intensive care unit (ICU) patients meeting basic communication criteria who could potentially be served by assistive communication tools and speech-language consultation. (2) Compare characteristics of patients who met communication criteria with those who did not.
DESIGN: Observational cohort study in which computerized billing and medical records were screened over a 2-year period.
SETTING: Six specialty ICUs across two hospitals in an academic health system. PARTICIPANTS: Eligible patients were awake, alert, and responsive to verbal communication from clinicians for at least one 12-h nursing shift while receiving MV ≥ 2 consecutive days. MAIN
RESULTS: Of the 2671 MV patients screened, 1440 (53.9%) met basic communication criteria. The Neurological ICU had the lowest proportion of MV patients meeting communication criteria (40.82%); Trauma ICU had the highest proportion (69.97%). MV patients who did not meet basic communication criteria (n = 1231) were younger, had shorter lengths of stay and lower costs, and were more likely to die during the hospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS: We estimate that half of MV patients in the ICU could potentially be served by assistive communication tools and speech-language consultation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial respiration; Communication; Intensive care unit; Nursing; Patient communication

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25261939      PMCID: PMC5935242          DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung        ISSN: 0147-9563            Impact factor:   2.210


  22 in total

1.  SPEACS-2: intensive care unit "communication rounds" with speech language pathology.

Authors:  Mary Beth Happ; Brooke M Baumann; Jennifer Sawicki; Judith A Tate; Elisabeth L George; Amber E Barnato
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 2.361

Review 2.  Reducing iatrogenic risks: ICU-acquired delirium and weakness--crossing the quality chasm.

Authors:  Eduard E Vasilevskis; E Wesley Ely; Theodore Speroff; Brenda T Pun; Leanne Boehm; Robert S Dittus
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Comparison of two types of communication methods used after cardiac surgery with patients with endotracheal tubes.

Authors:  B Stovsky; E Rudy; P Dragonette
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  Prevalence of sudden speechlessness in critical care units.

Authors:  Loris A Thomas; Carmen S Rodriguez
Journal:  Clin Nurs Res       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 2.075

5.  Listening to the voiceless patient: case reports in assisted communication in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jill V Radtke; Brooke M Baumann; Kathryn L Garrett; Mary Beth Happ
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Promoting effective communication for patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Irene Grossbach; Sarah Stranberg; Linda Chlan
Journal:  Crit Care Nurse       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 1.708

7.  The lived experiences of adult intensive care patients who were conscious during mechanical ventilation: a phenomenological-hermeneutic study.

Authors:  Veronika Karlsson; Ingegerd Bergbom; Anna Forsberg
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.072

8.  Factors related to the emotional responses of intubated patients to being unable to speak.

Authors:  L K Menzel
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.210

9.  Patients' reports of health care practitioner interventions that are related to communication during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Lance Patak; Anna Gawlinski; Ng Irene Fung; Lynn Doering; Jill Berg
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.210

10.  Electronic voice-output communication aids for temporarily nonspeaking patients in a medical intensive care unit: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Mary Beth Happ; Tricia Kenney Roesch; Kathryn Garrett
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.210

View more
  14 in total

1.  Prevalence of Advance Directives Among Older Adults Admitted to Intensive Care Units and Requiring Mechanical Ventilation.

Authors:  Elise M Gamertsfelder; Jennifer Burgher Seaman; Judith Tate; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Mary Beth Happ
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 1.254

2.  The cost of not addressing the communication barriers faced by hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Richard R Hurtig; Rebecca M Alper; Benjamin Berkowitz
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2018-01

3.  The Ethical Concerns of Seeking Consent from Critically Ill, Mechanically Ventilated Patients for Research - A Matter of Possessing Capacity or Surrogate Insight.

Authors:  Avelino C Verceles; Waqas Bhatti
Journal:  Clin Ethics       Date:  2018-03-19

4.  A Novel Picture Guide to Improve Spiritual Care and Reduce Anxiety in Mechanically Ventilated Adults in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Joel N Berning; Armeen D Poor; Sarah M Buckley; Komal R Patel; David J Lederer; Nathan E Goldstein; Daniel Brodie; Matthew R Baldwin
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-08

5.  Above cuff vocalisation: A novel technique for communication in the ventilator-dependent tracheostomy patient.

Authors:  Brendan McGrath; James Lynch; Mark Wilson; Leanne Nicholson; Sarah Wallace
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-10-05

Review 6.  Strategies for communicating with conscious mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

Authors:  Ariel M Modrykamien
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2019-07-22

7.  Barriers to and facilitators for supporting patient communication in the adult ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Laura Istanboulian; Louise Rose; Yana Yunusova; Craig Dale
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.057

8.  Communication of mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units.

Authors:  Carina Isabel Ferreira Martinho; Inês Tello Rato Milheiras Rodrigues
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2016-06

Review 9.  Communicating with conscious and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Ten Hoorn; P W Elbers; A R Girbes; P R Tuinman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  A pilot study assessing the spiritual, emotional, physical/environmental, and physiological needs of mechanically ventilated surgical intensive care unit patients via eye tracking devices, head nodding, and communication boards.

Authors:  Erin I Duffy; Jonah Garry; Lillian Talbot; David Pasternak; Ashley Flinn; Casey Minardi; Michele Dookram; Kathleen Grant; Debbie Fitzgerald; Jerry Rubano; James Vosswinkel; Randeep S Jawa
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2018-09-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.