Literature DB >> 27134237

Enhancing the Communication of Suddenly Speechless Critical Care Patients.

Carmen S Rodriguez1, Meredeth Rowe2, Loris Thomas2, Jonathan Shuster2, Brent Koeppel2, Paula Cairns2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sudden speechlessness is common in critically ill patients who are intubated or have had surgery for head and neck cancer. Sudden inability to speak poses challenges for hospitalized patients because strategies to facilitate communication are often limited and unreliable.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of a technology-based communication intervention on patients' perception of communication difficulty, satisfaction with communication methods, and frustration with communication.
METHODS: A quasi-experimental, 4-cohort (control and intervention) repeated-measures design was used. Data were collected daily for up to 10 days. Patients in adult critical care units were followed up as they were transferred to other units within the institutions selected for the study. The impact of a technology-based communication system (intervention) was compared with usual care (control). Patients' communication outcomes pertinent to communication with nursing staff that were evaluated included perception of communication ease, satisfaction with methods used for communication, and frustration with communication.
RESULTS: Compared with participants in the control group, participants in the intervention group reported lower mean frustration levels (-2.68; SE, 0.17; 95% CI, -3.02 to -2.34; P < .001) and higher mean satisfaction levels (0.59; SE, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.91; P < .001) with use of the communication intervention. Participants in the intervention group reported a consistent increase in perception of communication ease during the hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: The results facilitated evaluation of a bedside technology-based communication intervention tailored to the needs of suddenly speechless critically ill patients. ©2016 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27134237      PMCID: PMC4855698          DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2016217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  27 in total

1.  Communication aid for patients in ICU.

Authors:  M Etchels; F Macaulay; A Judson; S Ashraf
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  2000 Jan 27-Feb 2

2.  Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L Demers; M Monette; Y Lapierre; D L Arnold; C Wolfson
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2002 Jan 10-Feb 15       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium.

Authors:  S K Inouye; C H van Dyck; C A Alessi; S Balkin; A P Siegal; R I Horwitz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Curtis N Sessler; Mark S Gosnell; Mary Jo Grap; Gretchen M Brophy; Pam V O'Neal; Kimberly A Keane; Eljim P Tesoro; R K Elswick
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  The communication process with ventilator patients in the ICU as perceived by the nursing staff.

Authors:  I Bergbom-Engberg; H Haljamäe
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.072

6.  Communication ability, method, and content among nonspeaking nonsurviving patients treated with mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Mary Beth Happ; Patricia Tuite; Kathy Dobbin; Dana DiVirgilio-Thomas; Julius Kitutu
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Computer-assisted communication for critically ill patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Maurizio A Miglietta; Grant Bochicchio; Thomas M Scalea
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2004-09

8.  Patients' reports of health care practitioner interventions that are related to communication during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Lance Patak; Anna Gawlinski; Ng Irene Fung; Lynn Doering; Jill Berg
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.210

9.  Communication and socialisation (2): Perceptions of neophyte ITU nurses.

Authors:  A J Leathart
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.072

10.  Electronic voice-output communication aids for temporarily nonspeaking patients in a medical intensive care unit: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Mary Beth Happ; Tricia Kenney Roesch; Kathryn Garrett
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.210

View more
  10 in total

1.  The cost of not addressing the communication barriers faced by hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Richard R Hurtig; Rebecca M Alper; Benjamin Berkowitz
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2018-01

2.  Communication with invasive mechanically ventilated patients and the use of alternative devices: integrative review.

Authors:  Aziza Salem; Muayyad M Ahmad
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2018-07-24

Review 3.  Interventions to enable communication for adult patients requiring an artificial airway with or without mechanical ventilator support.

Authors:  Louise Rose; Anna-Liisa Sutt; Andre Carlos Amaral; Dean A Fergusson; Orla M Smith; Craig M Dale
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-12

4.  Feasibility of an iPad to Facilitate Communication in Postoperative Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Theresa H Brunner; Kristyn DiFortuna; Michael LeTang; Jane Murphy; Kara Stemplewicz; Magda Kovacs; Antonio P DeRosa; Donna S Gibson; Pamela K Ginex
Journal:  J Perianesth Nurs       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 1.084

Review 5.  Effectiveness of Digital Technologies to Support Nursing Care: Results of a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kai Huter; Tobias Krick; Dominik Domhoff; Kathrin Seibert; Karin Wolf-Ostermann; Heinz Rothgang
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2020-12-09

6.  iPad-based Apps to Facilitate Communication in Critically Ill Patients with Impaired Ability to Communicate: A Preclinical Analysis.

Authors:  Andrew J Dind; Joshua S Starr; Sumesh Arora
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-11

7.  Measuring the effectiveness of digital nursing technologies: development of a comprehensive digital nursing technology outcome framework based on a scoping review.

Authors:  Tobias Krick; Kai Huter; Kathrin Seibert; Dominik Domhoff; Karin Wolf-Ostermann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Improving Patient Safety and Patient-Provider Communication.

Authors:  Richard R Hurtig; Rebecca M Alper; Karen N T Bryant; Krista R Davidson; Chelsea Bilskemper
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2019-10-31

9.  Communicating to Non-Speaking Critically Ill Patients: Augmentative and Alternative Communication Technique as an Essential Strategy.

Authors:  Asaad Nasser Salim Al-Yahyai Rn Bsn; Judie Arulappan Rn Rm Bsc N Msc N PhD N DNSc; Gerald Amandu Matua; Sultan Marhoon Al-Ghafri Rn Bsn; Sami Hamood Al-Sarakhi Rn Bsn; Khalid Khalfan Said Al-Rahbi Rn Bsn; Sathish Kumar Jayapal
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2021-05-31

Review 10.  Nursing interventions to cover patients' basic needs in the intensive care context - A systematic review.

Authors:  Marie Hamilton Larsen; Gudrun Irene Johannessen; Kristin Heggdal
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-11-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.