Literature DB >> 28555313

Uneven intervertebral motion sharing is related to disc degeneration and is greater in patients with chronic, non-specific low back pain: an in vivo, cross-sectional cohort comparison of intervertebral dynamics using quantitative fluoroscopy.

Alan Breen1, Alexander Breen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evidence of intervertebral mechanical markers in chronic, non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is lacking. This research used dynamic fluoroscopic studies to compare intervertebral angular motion sharing inequality and variability (MSI and MSV) during continuous lumbar motion in CNSLBP patients and controls. Passive recumbent and active standing protocols were used and the relationships of these variables to age and disc degeneration were assessed.
METHODS: Twenty patients with CNSLBP and 20 matched controls received quantitative fluoroscopic lumbar spine examinations using a standardised protocol for data collection and image analysis. Composite disc degeneration (CDD) scores comprising the sum of Kellgren and Lawrence grades from L2-S1 were obtained. Indices of intervertebral motion sharing inequality (MSI) and variability (MSV) were derived and expressed in units of proportion of lumbar range of motion from outward and return motion sequences during lying (passive) and standing (active) lumbar bending and compared between patients and controls. Relationships between MSI, MSV, age and CDD were assessed by linear correlation.
RESULTS: MSI was significantly greater in the patients throughout the intervertebral motion sequences of recumbent flexion (0.29 vs. 0.22, p = 0.02) and when flexion, extension, left and right motion were combined to give a composite measure (1.40 vs. 0.92, p = 0.04). MSI correlated substantially with age (R = 0.85, p = 0.004) and CDD (R = 0.70, p = 0.03) in lying passive investigations in patients and not in controls. There were also substantial correlations between MSV and age (R = 0.77, p = 0.01) and CDD (R = 0.85, p = 0.004) in standing flexion in patients and not in controls.
CONCLUSION: Greater inequality and variability of motion sharing was found in patients with CNSLBP than in controls, confirming previous studies and suggesting a biomechanical marker for the disorder at intervertebral level. The relationship between disc degeneration and MSI was augmented in patients, but not in controls during passive motion and similarly for MSV during active motion, suggesting links between in vivo disc mechanics and pain generation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Back pain; Diagnosis; Fluoroscopy; Kinematics; Spinal injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28555313     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5155-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  45 in total

1.  Cineradiographic motion analysis of normal lumbar spine during forward and backward flexion.

Authors:  M Harada; K Abumi; M Ito; K Kaneda
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Segmental lumbar rotation in patients with discogenic low back pain during functional weight-bearing activities.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Shaobai Wang; Michal Kozanek; Qun Xia; Weishi Li; Brian Grottkau; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Advances in the diagnosis of degenerated lumbar discs and their possible clinical application.

Authors:  Marco Brayda-Bruno; Marta Tibiletti; Keita Ito; Jeremy Fairbank; Fabio Galbusera; Alberto Zerbi; Sally Roberts; Ellen Wachtel; Yulia Merkher; Sarit Sara Sivan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Kinematic analysis of dynamic lumbar motion in patients with lumbar segmental instability using digital videofluoroscopy.

Authors:  Amir Ahmadi; Nader Maroufi; Hamid Behtash; Hajar Zekavat; Mohamad Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Dynamic motion study of the whole lumbar spine by videofluoroscopy.

Authors:  A Okawa; K Shinomiya; H Komori; T Muneta; Y Arai; O Nakai
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Application of a stereoradiographic method for the study of intervertebral motion.

Authors:  A Plamondon; M Gagnon; G Maurais
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  ISSLS Prize Winner: Vertebral Endplate (Modic) Change is an Independent Risk Factor for Episodes of Severe and Disabling Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Juhani H Määttä; Sam Wadge; Alex MacGregor; Jaro Karppinen; Frances M K Williams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Some static mechanical properties of the lumbar intervertebral joint, intact and injured.

Authors:  A F Tencer; A M Ahmed; D L Burke
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  An objective spinal motion imaging assessment (OSMIA): reliability, accuracy and exposure data.

Authors:  Alan C Breen; Jennifer M Muggleton; Fiona E Mellor
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Relationships between Paraspinal Muscle Activity and Lumbar Inter-Vertebral Range of Motion.

Authors:  Alister du Rose; Alan Breen
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2016-01-05
View more
  8 in total

1.  Non-specific chronic low back pain: differences in spinal kinematics in subgroups during functional tasks.

Authors:  Rebecca Hemming; Liba Sheeran; Robert van Deursen; Valerie Sparkes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Intrasubject repeatability of in vivo intervertebral motion parameters using quantitative fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Breen; Rebecca Hemming; Fiona Mellor; Alan Breen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Aberrant intervertebral motion in patients with treatment-resistant nonspecific low back pain: a retrospective cohort study and control comparison.

Authors:  Alexander Breen; Fiona Mellor; Alan Breen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A Dynamic Optimization Approach for Solving Spine Kinematics While Calibrating Subject-Specific Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Dongmei Wang; Antoine Falisse; Pieter Severijns; Thomas Overbergh; Lieven Moke; Lennart Scheys; Friedl De Groote; Ilse Jonkers
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Effectiveness of Combined General Rehabilitation Gymnastics and Muscle Energy Techniques in Older Women with Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Michał Wendt; Krystyna Cieślik; Jacek Lewandowski; Małgorzata Waszak
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Comparison of intra subject repeatability of quantitative fluoroscopy and static radiography in the measurement of lumbar intervertebral flexion translation.

Authors:  Alexander Breen; Emilie Claerbout; Rebecca Hemming; Ravi Ayer; Alan Breen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Investigator analytic repeatability of two new intervertebral motion biomarkers for chronic, nonspecific low back pain in a cohort of healthy controls.

Authors:  Daphne To; Alexander Breen; Alan Breen; Silvano Mior; Samuel J Howarth
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2020-11-24

8.  What is the most appropriate method for the measurement of the range of motion in the lumbar spine and how does surgical fixation affect the range of movement of the lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Laura Hartley; Mattia Zappalà; Uzo Ehiogu; Nicola R Heneghan; Adrian Gardner
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-09-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.