Literature DB >> 22366932

[Is there a correlation between back pain and stability of the lumbar spine in pregnancy? A model-based hypothesis].

A Liebetrau1, C Puta, D Schinowski, T Wulf, H Wagner.   

Abstract

During pregnancy approximately 50% of women suffer from low back pain (LBP), which significantly affects their everyday life. The pain could result in chronic insomnia, limit the pregnant women in their ability to work and produce a reduction of their physical activity. The etiology of the pain is still critically discussed and not entirely understood. In the literature different explanations for LBP are given and one of the most common reasons is the anatomical changes of the female body during pregnancy; for instance, there is an increase in the sagittal moments because of the enlarged uterus and fetus and the occurrence of hyperlordosis.The aim of this study was to describe how the anatomical changes in pregnant women affect the stability and the moments acting on the lumbar spine with the help of a simplified musculoskeletal model.A two-dimensional musculoskeletal model of the lumbar spine in the sagittal plane consisting of five lumbar vertebrae was developed. The model included five centres of rotation and three antagonistic pairs of paraspinal muscles. The concept of altered acting torques during pregnancy was explored by varying the geometrical arrangements. The situations non-pregnant, pregnant and pregnant with hyperlordosis were considered for the model-based approach. These simulations were done dependent on the stability of the erect posture and local countertorques of every lumbar segment.In spite of the simplicity of the model and the musculoskeletal arrangement it was possible to maintain equilibrium of the erect posture at every lumbar spinal segment with one minimum physiological cross-sectional area of all paraspinal muscles. The stability of the musculoskeletal system depends on the muscular activity of the paraspinal muscles and diminishing the muscular activity causes unstable lumbar segments.The relationship between the non-pregnant and the pregnant simulations demonstrated a considerable increase of acting segmental countertorques. Simulating an increased lordosis for the pregnant situation in the sagittal plane substantially reduced these acting countertorques and therefore the demand on the segmental muscles.It is assumed that hyperlordosis is a physiological adaptation to the anatomical changes during pregnancy to minimize the segmental countertorques and therefore the demand on the segmental muscles.Further, it can be expected that an enhanced muscle activity caused by selective activity of lumbar muscles increases the stability of the lumbar spine and may improve the situation with LBP during pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22366932     DOI: 10.1007/s00482-011-1125-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  33 in total

Review 1.  Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering.

Authors:  A Bergmark
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1989

2.  Muscle reflex classification of low-back pain.

Authors:  N P Reeves; J Cholewicki; T E Milner
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2004-11-21       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Role of reflex gain and reflex delay in spinal stability--a dynamic simulation.

Authors:  Timothy C Franklin; Kevin P Granata
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  A revised anatomical model of the abdominal musculature for torso flexion efforts.

Authors:  S M McGill
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Transient laxity of an anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee related to pregnancy.

Authors:  A M Blecher; J C Richmond
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Influence of some biomechanical factors on low-back pain in pregnancy.

Authors:  H C Ostgaard; G B Andersson; A B Schultz; J A Miller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Musculoskeletal considerations in pregnancy.

Authors:  J D Heckman; R Sassard
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Fat content of lumbar paraspinal muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and in asymptomatic volunteers: quantification with MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Bernard Mengiardi; Marius R Schmid; Norbert Boos; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Florian Brunner; Achim Elfering; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  A Radebold; J Cholewicki; M M Panjabi; T C Patel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A morphological adaptation of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae to lumbar hyperlordosis in young and adult females.

Authors:  Youssef Masharawi; Gali Dar; Smadar Peleg; Nili Steinberg; Bahaa Medlej; Hila May; Janan Abbas; Israel Hershkovitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  2 in total

1.  Spinal lordosis optimizes the requirements for a stable erect posture.

Authors:  Heiko Wagner; Anne Liebetrau; David Schinowski; Thomas Wulf; Marc H E de Lussanet
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 2.432

2.  Atraumatic Sacral Fracture in Late Pregnancy: A Case Report.

Authors:  Dionysios K Giannoulis; Panagiotis Koulouvaris; Evgenia Zilakou; Dimitrios B Papadopoulos; Marios G Lykissas; Alexandros N Mavrodontidis
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.