Literature DB >> 26745908

Improving the accuracy in detection of clustered microcalcifications with a context-sensitive classification model.

Juan Wang1, Robert M Nishikawa2, Yongyi Yang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In computer-aided detection of microcalcifications (MCs), the detection accuracy is often compromised by frequent occurrence of false positives (FPs), which can be attributed to a number of factors, including imaging noise, inhomogeneity in tissue background, linear structures, and artifacts in mammograms. In this study, the authors investigated a unified classification approach for combating the adverse effects of these heterogeneous factors for accurate MC detection.
METHODS: To accommodate FPs caused by different factors in a mammogram image, the authors developed a classification model to which the input features were adapted according to the image context at a detection location. For this purpose, the input features were defined in two groups, of which one group was derived from the image intensity pattern in a local neighborhood of a detection location, and the other group was used to characterize how a MC is different from its structural background. Owing to the distinctive effect of linear structures in the detector response, the authors introduced a dummy variable into the unified classifier model, which allowed the input features to be adapted according to the image context at a detection location (i.e., presence or absence of linear structures). To suppress the effect of inhomogeneity in tissue background, the input features were extracted from different domains aimed for enhancing MCs in a mammogram image. To demonstrate the flexibility of the proposed approach, the authors implemented the unified classifier model by two widely used machine learning algorithms, namely, a support vector machine (SVM) classifier and an Adaboost classifier. In the experiment, the proposed approach was tested for two representative MC detectors in the literature [difference-of-Gaussians (DoG) detector and SVM detector]. The detection performance was assessed using free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) analysis on a set of 141 screen-film mammogram (SFM) images (66 cases) and a set of 188 full-field digital mammogram (FFDM) images (95 cases).
RESULTS: The FROC analysis results show that the proposed unified classification approach can significantly improve the detection accuracy of two MC detectors on both SFM and FFDM images. Despite the difference in performance between the two detectors, the unified classifiers can reduce their FP rate to a similar level in the output of the two detectors. In particular, with true-positive rate at 85%, the FP rate on SFM images for the DoG detector was reduced from 1.16 to 0.33 clusters/image (unified SVM) and 0.36 clusters/image (unified Adaboost), respectively; similarly, for the SVM detector, the FP rate was reduced from 0.45 clusters/image to 0.30 clusters/image (unified SVM) and 0.25 clusters/image (unified Adaboost), respectively. Similar FP reduction results were also achieved on FFDM images for the two MC detectors.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed unified classification approach can be effective for discriminating MCs from FPs caused by different factors (such as MC-like noise patterns and linear structures) in MC detection. The framework is general and can be applicable for further improving the detection accuracy of existing MC detectors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26745908      PMCID: PMC4691250          DOI: 10.1118/1.4938059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  17 in total

1.  A CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films.

Authors:  S Yu; L Guan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Normalization of local contrast in mammograms.

Authors:  W J Veldkamp; N Karssemeijer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  An SVM classifier to separate false signals from microcalcifications in digital mammograms.

Authors:  A Bazzani; A Bevilacqua; D Bollini; R Brancaccio; R Campanini; N Lanconelli; A Riccardi; D Romani
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Linear structures in mammographic images: detection and classification.

Authors:  Reyer Zwiggelaar; Susan M Astley; Caroline R M Boggis; Christopher J Taylor
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  A new kernel method for microcalcification detection: Spin Glass-Markov Random Fields.

Authors:  B Caputo; E La Torre; S Bouattour; G E Gigante
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2002

6.  Relevance vector machine for automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications.

Authors:  Liyang Wei; Yongyi Yang; Robert M Nishikawa; Miles N Wernick; Alexandra Edwards
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Segmentation of microcalcifications in mammograms.

Authors:  J Dengler; S Behrens; J F Desaga
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography.

Authors:  H P Chan; K Doi; S Galhotra; C J Vyborny; H MacMahon; P M Jokich
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Cancer statistics, 2015.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Wavelet transforms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms.

Authors:  R N Strickland; H I Hahn
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  6 in total

1.  Global detection approach for clustered microcalcifications in mammograms using a deep learning network.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Robert M Nishikawa; Yongyi Yang
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-04-22

2.  Locally adaptive decision in detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.

Authors:  María V Sainz de Cea; Robert M Nishikawa; Yongyi Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A multi-resolution approach for spinal metastasis detection using deep Siamese neural networks.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Zhiyuan Fang; Ning Lang; Huishu Yuan; Min-Ying Su; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  A context-sensitive deep learning approach for microcalcification detection in mammograms.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Yongyi Yang
Journal:  Pattern Recognit       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 7.740

5.  Estimating the Accuracy Level Among Individual Detections in Clustered Microcalcifications.

Authors:  Maria V Sainz de Cea; Robert M Nishikawa; Yongyi Yang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Detecting Cardiovascular Disease from Mammograms With Deep Learning.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Huanjun Ding; Fatemeh Azamian Bidgoli; Brian Zhou; Carlos Iribarren; Sabee Molloi; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 10.048

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.