Literature DB >> 15371911

Practice patterns of obstetrician-gynecologists regarding preconception and prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis.

Maria A Morgan1, Deborah A Driscoll, Michael T Mennuti, Jay Schulkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess practices of obstetrician-gynecologists regarding carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF).
METHODS: A questionnaire investigating practice patterns and opinions pertaining to CF screening was mailed to 1165 members of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), of whom 565 participate in the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network (CARN) and 600 were randomly selected.
RESULTS: Of the questionnaires, 64% were returned. Statistical analyses were limited to the 632 respondents whose primary medical specialty was gynecology (Gyn Only) or obstetrics and gynecology (ObGyn). CARN membership was not a significant factor on any nondemographic measure. Almost one-half of physicians do not ask nonpregnant patients their family history of CF or provide them with information about CF screening. The majority of ObGyns (88.7%) ask obstetric patients their family history of CF, and offer CF carrier screening. Almost two-thirds (65.8%) offer screening to all prenatal patients. Among those ObGyns who selectively offer CF screening to pregnant patients, only 27.4% utilized all of the selection criteria in the guidelines. Liability for not offering screening, familiarity with CF, and the ability to interpret a positive screening test were important physician concerns.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate a need for minimizing the complexity of clinical guidelines for population-based genetic screening, prospective assessment of implementation and focused continuing education for providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15371911     DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000139509.04177.4b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  18 in total

1.  Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing Recommendations are Influenced by Maternal Age, Statistical Misconception and Perceived Liability.

Authors:  Talya Miron-Shatz; Sivan R Rapaport; Naama Srebnik; Yaniv Hanoch; Jonina Rabinowitz; Glen M Doniger; Linda Levi; Jonathan J Rolison; Avi Tsafrir
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Genetic screening.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Beth Tarini; Nancy A Press; James P Evans
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Expanded carrier screening: a current survey of physician utilization and attitudes.

Authors:  Allison Briggs; Parvaneh K Nouri; Michael Galloway; Kathleen O'Leary; Nigel Pereira; Steven R Lindheim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Attitudes of health care professionals toward carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. A review of the literature.

Authors:  S Janssens; A De Paepe; P Borry
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-12-29

5.  The changing landscape of carrier screening: expanding technology and options?.

Authors:  Michelle L McGowan; Deborah Cho; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Health Matrix Clevel       Date:  2013

6.  Attitudes and opinions of pregnant women who are not offered cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

Authors:  Liane Ioannou; John Massie; Sharon Lewis; Veronica Collins; Belinda McClaren; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Changing incidence of cystic fibrosis in Wisconsin, USA.

Authors:  Katelyn Parker-McGill; Melodee Nugent; Rachel Bersie; Gary Hoffman; Michael Rock; Mei Baker; Philip M Farrell; Pippa Simpson; Hara Levy
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2015-08-10

8.  Pediatricians' attitudes about screening newborns for infectious diseases.

Authors:  Hanna Schittek; Joy Koopmans; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-12-09

Review 9.  The future of cystic fibrosis care: a global perspective.

Authors:  Scott C Bell; Marcus A Mall; Hector Gutierrez; Milan Macek; Susan Madge; Jane C Davies; Pierre-Régis Burgel; Elizabeth Tullis; Claudio Castaños; Carlo Castellani; Catherine A Byrnes; Fiona Cathcart; Sanjay H Chotirmall; Rebecca Cosgriff; Irmgard Eichler; Isabelle Fajac; Christopher H Goss; Pavel Drevinek; Philip M Farrell; Anna M Gravelle; Trudy Havermans; Nicole Mayer-Hamblett; Nataliya Kashirskaya; Eitan Kerem; Joseph L Mathew; Edward F McKone; Lutz Naehrlich; Samya Z Nasr; Gabriela R Oates; Ciaran O'Neill; Ulrike Pypops; Karen S Raraigh; Steven M Rowe; Kevin W Southern; Sheila Sivam; Anne L Stephenson; Marco Zampoli; Felix Ratjen
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 30.700

10.  Use of Factor V Leiden genetic testing in practice and impact on management.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Laberge; Bruce M Psaty; Lucia A Hindorff; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.