Literature DB >> 19067138

Pediatricians' attitudes about screening newborns for infectious diseases.

Hanna Schittek1, Joy Koopmans, Lainie Friedman Ross.   

Abstract

In 2002, the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) commissioned the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) to recommend a uniform newborn screening (NBS) panel. The ACMG sent out a survey to stakeholders to evaluate 80 metabolic and genetic conditions and 3 infectious diseases (Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Toxoplasmosis (Toxo), and Cytomegalovirus (CMV)). In March 2005, the ACMG/HRSA report recommended a panel including 29 metabolic and genetic conditions and 25 secondary targets. This panel was endorsed by the newly-formed U.S. Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders and Genetic Diseases in Newborns and Children (Advisory Committee). Decisions about infectious diseases were deferred by the ACMG/HRSA committee due to limited survey responses and lack of expertise of surveyed stakeholders and committee members. The Advisory Committee has not pursued these conditions further. In this manuscript, we examine the attitudes of U.S. pediatricians toward targeted and universal screening of newborns for these three infectious diseases. Members of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) sections of infectious disease (n = 150) and community pediatrics (n = 150) plus 13 contributors to the AAP Red Book were surveyed by email or fax. Of eligible pediatricians, 113 of 297 (38%) returned surveys. Seventy-four percent supported either targeted or universal NBS for HIV, 57% for Toxo, but only 42% for CMV. The majority of respondents support screening newborns for HIV and Toxo. The Advisory Committee ought to solicit a systematic evaluation of these conditions to determine whether they should be included in the uniform panel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19067138     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-008-0431-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  58 in total

Review 1.  Congenital cytomegalovirus infection.

Authors:  Cheryl A Jones
Journal:  Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care       Date:  2003-03

2.  Does familiarity breed acceptance? The influence of policy on physicians' attitudes toward newborn screening programs.

Authors:  Joy Koopmans; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  The cost effectiveness of universal versus selective newborn screening for sickle cell disease in the US and the UK: a critique.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Richard S Olney; Mary Ann Baily
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.561

4.  Trends in perinatal transmission of HIV/AIDS in the United States.

Authors:  M L Lindegren; R H Byers; P Thomas; S F Davis; B Caldwell; M Rogers; M Gwinn; J W Ward; P L Fleming
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: phenylketonuria: screening and management, October 16-18, 2000.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  The impact of expected HIV transmission rates on the effectiveness and cost of ruling out HIV infection in infants.

Authors:  Joseph M Mrus; Michael S Yi; Mark H Eckman; Joel Tsevat
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 7.  Economic evaluation of preventive programmes against congenital toxoplasmosis.

Authors:  B Stray-Pedersen; P Jenum
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1992

8.  Ethnic intermarriage and its consequences for cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

Authors:  F Gilbert; J Schoelkopf; Z Li; I I Arzimanoglou; M Shaham; J Udey; I Arzimanoglou
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Failure to identify human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive newborns: epidemiology and enrollment patterns in a predominantly white, nonurban setting.

Authors:  J Coplan; T D Dye; K A Contello; C K Cunningham; K Kirkwood; L B Weiner
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Newborn screening for congenital infectious diseases.

Authors:  Eurico Camargo Neto; Rosélia Rubin; Jacqueline Schulte; Roberto Giugliani
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  1 in total

1.  Expectations and values about expanded newborn screening: a public engagement study.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Fiona A Miller; Yvonne Bombard; Denise Avard; June Carroll; Brenda Wilson; Julian Little; Pranesh Chakraborty; Jessica Bytautas; Yves Giguere; Judith Allanson; Renata Axler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.377

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.