Literature DB >> 15363559

Can Power Doppler enhanced transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection on first and repeat prostate biopsy?

Mesut Remzi1, Michael Dobrovits, Andreas Reissigl, Vincent Ravery, Mattias Waldert, Christian Wiunig, Yan Kit Fong, Bob Djavan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of Power Doppler enhanced transrectal ultrasound (PD-TRUS) and its guided prostate biopsies in men with prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels between 2.5 and 10 ng/ml and to evaluate its impact on prostate cancer (PCa) detection in men undergoing first and repeat biopsies.
METHODS: A total of 136 consecutive referred men with serum total PSA (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) levels between 2.5 and 10 ng/ml (mean age 64 +/- 9 years, range 45-82) and a normal digital rectal examination were included. 101 underwent a first biopsy whereas 35 had repeat biopsy. Gray-scale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and PD-TRUS (B&K Medical, Denmark) were performed in lithotomy position before and during the biopsy procedure. Vascularity accumulation and perfusion characteristics were recorded and graded as normal or abnormal in the peripheral zone of the prostate. A Vienna-nomogram based biopsy regime was performed in all patients on first biopsy and a special biopsy regime on repeat biopsy plus additional biopsies from abnormal sites on PD-TRUS.
RESULTS: Overall PCa detection rate was 34.7% and 25.7% and abnormal accumulation on PD-TRUS was identified in 42.3% and 48.6% on first and repeat biopsy, respectively. The PCa detection rate, on first and repeat biopsy in patients with and without PD-TRUS accumulation were 67.4% versus 10.3% (p < 0.001) and 47.05% versus 5.6% (p = 0.0049), respectively. PD-TRUS directed biopsies were positive in 5.7% and 11.1% on first and repeat biopsy whereas PCa detection using the routine prostate biopsy regime was 94.3% and 88.9% on first and repeat biopsy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of PD-TRUS signal alone for PCa detection on first biopsy was 82.8%, 78.8%, 87.9% and 89.7%, respectively, and 88.8%, 68.0%, 47.0% and 94.4% on repeat biopsy, respectively. In comparison, the results PD-TRUS guided biopsies were 53.8%, 59.1%, 16.7%, and 89.5%, on first biopsy, respectively, and 20.0%, 13.3%, 23.5%, 11.1% on repeat biopsy, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Negative PD-TRUS signal is able to exclude most of the patients without PCa in the PSA range of 2.5-10 ng/ml. As an additional tool at TRUS biopsy PD-TRUS has a high negative predictive value and may help to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15363559     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  11 in total

Review 1.  A comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Hilco van Moerkerk; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Ferdinand Frauscher; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  What's New in Prostate Cancer, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, and Minimally Invasive Surgery?: Highlights from the XIXth Congress of the European Association of Urology, March 23-27, 2004, Vienna, Austria.

Authors:  Theodore Anagnostou; Yan Kit Fong; Mesut Remzi; Michael Dobrovits; Amir Kaisary; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

3.  Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

4.  Prostate histoscanning true targeting guided prostate biopsy: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Arjun Sivaraman; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Eric Barret; Petr Macek; Pierre Validire; Marc Galiano; Francois Rozet; Xavier Cathelineau
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Ultrasonography in prostate cancer: current roles and potential applications in radiorecurrent disease.

Authors:  James S Rosoff; Sandip M Prasad; Stephen J Savage
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Shear wave dispersion ultrasonic vibrometry for measuring prostate shear stiffness and viscosity: an in vitro pilot study.

Authors:  F G Mitri; M W Urban; M Fatemi; J F Greenleaf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  [Imaging procedures to diagnose prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Seitz; B Scher; M Scherr; D Tilki; B Schlenker; C Gratzke; A Schipf; P Stanislaus; U Müller-Lisse; O Reich; C Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Evaluation of T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in localizing prostate cancer before repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Alexandre Ben Cheikh; Nicolas Girouin; Marc Colombel; Jean-Marie Maréchal; Albert Gelet; Alvine Bissery; Muriel Rabilloud; Denis Lyonnet; Olivier Rouvière
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Doppler spectral waveform parameters at neurovascular bundle vessels in patients with prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Yuh-Shyan Tsai; Yeong-Chin Jou; Chia-Hong Chen; Chien-Chen Chang; Wen-Horng Yang; Jan-Li Lai; Tzong-Shin Tzai
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Evaluation of Prostatic Lesions by Transrectal Ultrasound, Color Doppler, and the Histopathological Correlation.

Authors:  Sachin Khanduri; Gaurav Katyal; Aakshit Goyal; Saurav Bhagat; Santosh Yadav; Tarim Usmani; Nikita Singh; Mriganki Chaudhary; Shobha Khanduri
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-07-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.