Literature DB >> 18925403

Evaluation of T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in localizing prostate cancer before repeat biopsy.

Alexandre Ben Cheikh1, Nicolas Girouin, Marc Colombel, Jean-Marie Maréchal, Albert Gelet, Alvine Bissery, Muriel Rabilloud, Denis Lyonnet, Olivier Rouvière.   

Abstract

We assessed the accuracy of T2-weighted (T2w) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in localizing prostate cancer before transrectal ultrasound-guided repeat biopsy. Ninety-three patients with abnormal PSA level and negative prostate biopsy underwent T2w and DCE prostate MRI using pelvic coil before repeat biopsy. T2w and DCE images were interpreted using visual criteria only. MR results were correlated with repeat biopsy findings in ten prostate sectors. Repeat biopsy found prostate cancer in 23 patients (24.7%) and 44 sectors (6.6%). At per patient analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 47.8%, 44.3%, 20.4% and 79.5% for T2w imaging and 82.6%, 20%, 24.4% and 93.3% for DCE imaging. When all suspicious areas (on T2w or DCE imaging) were taken into account, a sensitivity of 82.6% and a negative predictive value of 100% could be achieved. At per sector analysis, DCE imaging was significantly less specific (83.5% vs. 89.7%, p < 0.002) than T2w imaging; it was more sensitive (52.4% vs. 32.1%), but the difference was hardly significant (p = 0.09). T2w and DCE MRI using pelvic coil and visual diagnostic criteria can guide prostate repeat biopsy, with a good sensitivity and NPV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18925403     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1190-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  44 in total

1.  Follow-up of men with elevated prostate-specific antigen and one set of benign biopsies at prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Björn Zackrisson; Gunnar Aus; Hans Lilja; Pär Lodding; Carl-Gustaf Pihl; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Prostate MR imaging at high-field strength: evolution or revolution?

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Robert P Hartman; Denis Lyonnet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Wash-in rate on the basis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: usefulness for prostate cancer detection and localization.

Authors:  Jeong Kon Kim; Seong Sook Hong; Young Jun Choi; Seong Ho Park; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim; Kyoung-Sik Cho
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Initial experiences with real-time elastography guided biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  Katharina König; Ulrich Scheipers; Andreas Pesavento; Andreas Lorenz; Helmut Ermert; Theodor Senge
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Predictors of cancer in repeat extended multisite prostate biopsy in men with previous negative extended multisite biopsy.

Authors:  Badar M Mian; Yoshio Naya; Koji Okihara; Funda Vakar-Lopez; Patricia Troncoso; R Joseph Babaian
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging-directed transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies in patients at risk of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Robert L Grubb; S Justin Lee; Marc A Bjurlin; Paul Albert; Anurag K Singh; Iclal Ocak; Peter Choyke; Jonathan A Coleman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 7.  How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate?

Authors:  Alexander P S Kirkham; Mark Emberton; Clare Allen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Anurag K Singh; Jochen Kruecker; Sheng Xu; Neil Glossop; Peter Guion; Karen Ullman; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Can Power Doppler enhanced transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection on first and repeat prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Michael Dobrovits; Andreas Reissigl; Vincent Ravery; Mattias Waldert; Christian Wiunig; Yan Kit Fong; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Prospective evaluation of lateral biopsies of the peripheral zone for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  J J Chang; K Shinohara; V Bhargava; J C Presti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  [Multiparametric MRI, elastography, contrastenhanced TRUS. Are there indications with reliable diagnostic advantages before prostate biopsy?].

Authors:  A Hegele; L Skrobek; R Hofmann; P Olbert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Combined prostate diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI at 3T--quantitative correlation with biopsy.

Authors:  Piotr Kozlowski; Silvia D Chang; Ran Meng; Burkhard Mädler; Robert Bell; Edward C Jones; S Larry Goldenberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pharmacokinetic models in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tobias Franiel; Bernd Hamm; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Overview of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Sadhna Verma; Baris Turkbey; Naira Muradyan; Arumugam Rajesh; Francois Cornud; Masoom A Haider; Peter L Choyke; Mukesh Harisinghani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Prospective comparison of T2w-MRI and dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI, 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging or diffusion-weighted MRI in repeat TRUS-guided biopsies.

Authors:  Daniel Portalez; Gautier Rollin; Pierre Leandri; Benjamin Elman; Patrick Mouly; Frédéric Jonca; Bernard Malavaud
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study.

Authors:  Flavie Bratan; Emilie Niaf; Christelle Melodelima; Anne Laure Chesnais; Rémi Souchon; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Marc Colombel; Olivier Rouvière
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Modalities for imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H Hou; D Swanson; A B Barqawi
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-03-17

Review 8.  Imaging techniques for prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Prostate cancer transrectal HIFU ablation: detection of local recurrences using T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Nicolas Girouin; Ludivine Glas; Alexandre Ben Cheikh; Albert Gelet; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Muriel Rabilloud; Jean-Yves Chapelon; Denis Lyonnet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Development and preliminary evaluation of a motorized needle guide template for MRI-guided targeted prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Sang-Eun Song; Junichi Tokuda; Kemal Tuncali; Clare M Tempany; Elizabeth Zhang; Nobuhiko Hata
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.