Literature DB >> 15361578

Domain swapping is a consequence of minimal frustration.

Sichun Yang1, Samuel S Cho, Yaakov Levy, Margaret S Cheung, Herbert Levine, Peter G Wolynes, José N Onuchic.   

Abstract

The same energy landscape principles associated with the folding of proteins into their monomeric conformations should also describe how these proteins oligomerize into domain-swapped conformations. We tested this hypothesis by using a simplified model for the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway substrate 8 src homology 3 domain protein, both of whose monomeric and domain-swapped structures have been solved. The model, which we call the symmetrized Gō-type model, incorporates only information regarding the monomeric conformation in an energy function for the dimer to predict the domain-swapped conformation. A striking preference for the correct domain-swapped structure was observed, indicating that overall monomer topology is a main determinant of the structure of domain-swapped dimers. Furthermore, we explore the free energy surface for domain swapping by using our model to characterize the mechanism of oligomerization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15361578      PMCID: PMC518834          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0403724101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  33 in total

1.  Structure of Met-enkephalin in explicit aqueous solution using replica exchange molecular dynamics.

Authors:  K Y Sanbonmatsu; A E García
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-02-01

Review 2.  Protein folding and three-dimensional domain swapping: a strained relationship?

Authors:  Marcia E Newcomer
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 3.  3D domain swapping: as domains continue to swap.

Authors:  Yanshun Liu; David Eisenberg
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  The unfolding story of three-dimensional domain swapping.

Authors:  Frederic Rousseau; Joost W H Schymkowitz; Laura S Itzhaki
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Molecular dynamics simulation of the SH3 domain aggregation suggests a generic amyloidogenesis mechanism.

Authors:  Feng Ding; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Sergey V Buldyrev; H Eugene Stanley; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Protein topology determines binding mechanism.

Authors:  Yaakov Levy; Peter G Wolynes; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Intermediates control domain swapping during folding of p13suc1.

Authors:  Frederic Rousseau; Joost W H Schymkowitz; Hannah R Wilkinson; Laura S Itzhaki
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-12-07       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  De novo design of foldable proteins with smooth folding funnel: automated negative design and experimental verification.

Authors:  Wenzhen Jin; Ohki Kambara; Hiroaki Sasakawa; Atsuo Tamura; Shoji Takada
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Using deeply trapped intermediates to map the cytochrome c folding landscape.

Authors:  F Akif Tezcan; William M Findley; Brian R Crane; Scott A Ross; Julia G Lyubovitsky; Harry B Gray; Jay R Winkler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Water in protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Garegin A Papoian; Johan Ulander; Michael P Eastwood; Zaida Luthey-Schulten; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  72 in total

1.  The origin of nonmonotonic complex behavior and the effects of nonnative interactions on the diffusive properties of protein folding.

Authors:  Ronaldo J Oliveira; Paul C Whitford; Jorge Chahine; Jin Wang; José N Onuchic; Vitor B P Leite
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Strand swapping regulates the iron-sulfur cluster in the diabetes drug target mitoNEET.

Authors:  Elizabeth Leigh Baxter; Patricia A Jennings; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The Landscape of Intertwined Associations in Homooligomeric Proteins.

Authors:  Shoshana J Wodak; Anatoly Malevanets; Stephen S MacKinnon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Predictive energy landscapes for folding membrane protein assemblies.

Authors:  Ha H Truong; Bobby L Kim; Nicholas P Schafer; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Computational studies of the reversible domain swapping of p13suc1.

Authors:  Jorge Chahine; Margaret S Cheung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Multiple routes lead to the native state in the energy landscape of the beta-trefoil family.

Authors:  Leslie L Chavez; Shachi Gosavi; Patricia A Jennings; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Protein folding thermodynamics and dynamics: where physics, chemistry, and biology meet.

Authors:  Eugene Shakhnovich
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Molecular dynamics with the United-residue force field: ab initio folding simulations of multichain proteins.

Authors:  Ana V Rojas; Adam Liwo; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Conformational transitions of adenylate kinase: switching by cracking.

Authors:  Paul C Whitford; Osamu Miyashita; Yaakov Levy; José N Onuchic
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Intrinsically Disordered Regions of the DNA-Binding Domain of Human FoxP1 Facilitate Domain Swapping.

Authors:  Exequiel Medina; Pablo Villalobos; George L Hamilton; Elizabeth A Komives; Hugo Sanabria; César A Ramírez-Sarmiento; Jorge Babul
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.