Literature DB >> 15359752

Establishing benchmarks for creation of a pro-forma economic model to evaluate filmless PACS operation.

B Reiner1, E Siegel, D Bradham, H Saunders, B Johnson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish data points (benchmarks) to incorporate into a pro-forma cost analysis model, comparing film-based and filmless modes of operation. Prospective data were collected over a 6-year period at the Baltimore VA Medical Center (BVAMC) immediately before and after implementation of a hospital-wide PACS. These data were in turn compared with local and national VA centers during comparable time periods, to establish reference data between manual film-based (without PACS) and filmless operations (using PACS). Benchmarks utilized for the study fell into 2 broad categories: operational costs and revenues generated. Factors contributing to operational costs include space requirements, equipment, supplies, personnel, and maintenance. Factors contributing to revenues generated included examination volume, modality mix, and reimbursement rates. Collectively, these data points were incorporated into a pro-forma model that allows prospective PACS customers to compare total cost of ownership for film-based and filmless operations dependent on the unique variables of the respective institution.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 15359752      PMCID: PMC3452966          DOI: 10.1007/bf03168386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  13 in total

Review 1.  Understanding financing options for PACS implementation. Picture archiving and communication systems.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Impact of filmless radiology on frequency of clinician consultations with radiologists.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel; Z Protopapas; F Hooper; H Ghebrekidan; M Scanlon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Evaluation of personnel savings through PACS: a modelling approach.

Authors:  R P van der Loo; E M van Gennip
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1992-05

4.  Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of PACS.

Authors:  P E Hilsenrath; W L Smith; K S Berbaum; E A Franken; D A Owen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Impact of filmless imaging on the frequency of clinician review of radiology images.

Authors:  B I Reiner; E L Siegel; F Hooper; Z Protopapas
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Incremental cost of department-wide implementation of a picture archiving and communication system and computed radiography.

Authors:  H M Pratt; C P Langlotz; E R Feingold; J S Schwartz; H L Kundel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists.

Authors:  B I Reiner; E L Siegel; F J Hooper; D Glasser
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Processes involved in reading imaging studies: workflow analysis and implications for workstation development.

Authors:  S B Gay; A H Sobel; L Q Young; S J Dwyer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Effect of filmless imaging on the utilization of radiologic services.

Authors:  B I Reiner; E L Siegel; C Flagle; F J Hooper; R E Cox; M Scanlon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Hospital activities of radiology groups in the United States: results of a 1992 ACR survey.

Authors:  S Bansal; J H Sunshine
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.