Literature DB >> 9735455

Impact of filmless imaging on the frequency of clinician review of radiology images.

B I Reiner1, E L Siegel, F Hooper, Z Protopapas.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of filmless imaging on the frequency with which physicians access radiology images and to assess clinician perception of image accessibility using a hospital-wide Picture Archival and Communication System (PACS). Quantitative data were collected at the Baltimore VA Medical Center (BVAMC), prior to and after conversion to filmless imaging, to determine the frequency with which clinicians access radiology images. Survey data were also collected to assess physician preferences of image accessibility, time management, and overall patient care when comparing filmless and film-based modes of operation. In general, there was a significant increase in the average number of radiology images reviewed by clinicians throughout the hospital. However, the one are in the hospital where this trend was not observed was in the intensive care unit (ICU), where the frequency of image assess was similar between film and filmless operations. Ninety-eight percent of clinicians surveyed reported improved accessibility of images in a filmless environment resulting in improved time management. The mean clinician estimate of time saved due to the use of PACS was 44 minutes. The study documented a combination of clinician perception of improved accessibility and substantial time savings with the use of a hospital-wide PACS, which was supported by objective measurements. The increased frequency of image review by clinicians and rapid image access should provide a further impetus to radiologists to decrease report turnaround time to provided "added value" for patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9735455      PMCID: PMC3453391          DOI: 10.1007/bf03168288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  6 in total

1.  Clinicians' access to diagnostic imaging information at an academic center: perceived impact on patient management.

Authors:  D Gur; W H Straub; R H Lieberman; R C Gennari
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  The hidden costs of delayed access to diagnostic imaging information: impact on PACS implementation.

Authors:  W H Straub; D Gur
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Evaluation of PACS-induced organizational change.

Authors:  R N Warburton
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1992-05

Review 4.  Picture archiving and communication systems: an overview.

Authors:  R H Choplin; J M Boehme; C D Maynard
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  A methodology for the economic assessment of picture archiving and communication systems.

Authors:  C P Langlotz; O Even-Shoshan; S S Seshadri; I Brikman; S Kishore; H L Kundel; J S Schwartz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Making filmless radiology work.

Authors:  E L Siegel; J N Diaconis; S Pomerantz; R Allman; B Briscoe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.056

  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  Clinical input into designing a PACS.

Authors:  D M Yousem; N J Beauchamp
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Understanding financing options for PACS implementation. Picture archiving and communication systems.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Integration of radiographic images with an electronic medical record.

Authors:  J M Overhage; A Aisen; M Barnes; M Tucker; C J McDonald
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

Review 4.  Evolution of the digital revolution: a radiologist perspective.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Eliot L Siegel; Khan Siddiqui
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Establishing benchmarks for creation of a pro-forma economic model to evaluate filmless PACS operation.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel; D Bradham; H Saunders; B Johnson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  Optimizing physicians' instruction of PACS through e-learning: cognitive load theory applied.

Authors:  P Devolder; B Pynoo; T Voet; L Adang; J Vercruysse; P Duyck
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Impact of electronic imaging on clinician behavior in the urgent care setting.

Authors:  C W Mattern; B J Erickson; B F King; T W Okryznski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 8.  The impact of PACS on clinician work practices in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Isla M Hains; Andrew Georgiou; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 9.  Mapping turnaround times (TAT) to a generic timeline: a systematic review of TAT definitions in clinical domains.

Authors:  Bernhard Breil; Fleur Fritz; Volker Thiemann; Martin Dugas
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Impact of picture archiving communication systems on rates of duplicate imaging: a before-after study.

Authors:  John J You; Lingsong Yun; Jack V Tu
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.