Literature DB >> 9577498

Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists.

B I Reiner1, E L Siegel, F J Hooper, D Glasser.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the relative time required for a technologist to perform a computed tomographic (CT) examination in a "filmless" versus a film-based environment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Time-motion studies were performed in 204 consecutive CT examinations. Images from 96 examinations were electronically transferred to a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) without being printed to film, and 108 were printed to film. The time required to obtain and electronically transfer the images or print the images to film and make the current and previous studies available to the radiologists for interpretation was recorded.
RESULTS: The time required for a technologist to complete a CT examination was reduced by 45% with direct image transfer to the PACS compared with the time required in the film-based mode. This reduction was due to the elimination of a number of steps in the filming process, such as the printing at multiple window or level settings.
CONCLUSION: The use of a PACS can result in the elimination of multiple time-intensive tasks for the CT technologist, resulting in a marked reduction in examination time. This reduction can result in increased productivity, and, hence greater cost-effectiveness with filmless operation.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9577498     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  19 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances: diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  J Hawnaur
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-17

2.  Adoption of alternative financing strategies to increase the diffusion of picture archiving and communication systems into the radiology marketplace.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel; P McKay
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Challenges associated with interfacing computed tomography to a picture archiving and communication system at the Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center--a historical perspective.

Authors:  P M Kuzmak; B I Reiner; E L Siegel; S M Severance; R E Dayhoff
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Transmission failure rate for computed tomography examinations in a filmless imaging department.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel; P Kuzmak; S Severance
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Significant savings in radiologic report turnaround time after implementation of a complete picture archiving and communication system (PACS).

Authors:  A A Twair; W C Torreggiani; S M Mahmud; N Ramesh; B Hogan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Electronic imaging and clinical implementation: work group approach at Mayo Clinic, Rochester.

Authors:  B F King; B J Erickson; B Williamson; C C Reading; E M James; S K Ramthun; D A Owen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Impact of electronic signature on radiology report turnaround time.

Authors:  Luigi Lepanto
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Changes in technologist productivity with implementation of an enterprisewide PACS.

Authors:  Bruce Reiner; Eliot Siegel; Mary Scanlon
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Establishing benchmarks for creation of a pro-forma economic model to evaluate filmless PACS operation.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel; D Bradham; H Saunders; B Johnson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Coping with PACS downtime in digital radiology.

Authors:  M McBiles; A K Chacko
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.