Literature DB >> 15355559

An improved segmentation method for in vivo microCT imaging.

Jan H Waarsing1, Judd S Day, Harrie Weinans.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Image segmentation methods for microCT can influence the accuracy of bone morphometry calculations. A new automated segmentation method is introduced, and its performance is compared with standard segmentation methods. The new method can improve the results of in vivo microCT, where the need to keep radiation dose low limits scan quality.
INTRODUCTION: An important topic for microCT analysis of bone samples is the segmentation of the original reconstructed grayscale data sets to separate bone from non-bone. Problems like noise, resolution limitations, and beam-hardening make this a nontrivial issue. Inappropriate segmentation methods will reduce the potential power of microCT and may introduce bias in the architectural measurements, in particular, when new in vivo microCT with its inherent limitations in scan quality is used. Here we introduce a new segmentation method using local thresholds and compare its performance to standard global segmentation methods.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The local threshold method was validated by comparing the result of the segmentation with histology. Furthermore, the effect of choosing this new method versus standard segmentation methods using global threshold values was investigated by studying the sensitivity of these methods to signal to noise ratio and resolution.
RESULTS: Using the new method on high-quality scans yielded accurate results and virtually no differences between histology and the segmented data sets could be observed. When prior knowledge about the volume fraction of the bone was available the global threshold also resulted in appropriate results. Degrading the scan quality had only minor effects on the performance of the new segmentation method. Although global segmentation methods were not sensitive to noise, it was not possible to segment both lower mineralized thin trabeculae and the higher mineralized cortex correctly with the same threshold value.
CONCLUSION: At high resolutions, both the new local and conventional global segmentation methods gave near exact representations of the bone structure. When scanned samples are not homogenous (e.g., thick cortices and thin trabeculae) and when resolution is relatively low, the local segmentation method outperforms global methods. It maximizes the potential of in vivo microCT by giving good structural representation without the need to use longer scanning times that would increase absorption of harmful X-ray radiation by the living tissue.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15355559     DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.040705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  65 in total

1.  A three-dimensional microcomputed tomographic study of site-specific variation in trabecular microarchitecture in the human second metacarpal.

Authors:  Richard A Lazenby; Sarah Angus; David M L Cooper; Benedikt Hallgrímsson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  A comparative evaluation of cone beam CT and micro-CT on trabecular bone structures in the human mandible.

Authors:  J Van Dessel; Y Huang; M Depypere; I Rubira-Bullen; F Maes; R Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  The use of nano-computed tomography to enhance musculoskeletal research.

Authors:  Basma M Khoury; Erin M R Bigelow; Lauren M Smith; Stephen H Schlecht; Erica L Scheller; Nelly Andarawis-Puri; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.417

4.  Low-magnitude whole body vibration does not affect bone mass but does affect weight in ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Olav P van der Jagt; Jacqueline C van der Linden; Jan H Waarsing; Jan A N Verhaar; Harrie Weinans
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Structural parameters of normal and osteoporotic human trabecular bone are affected differently by microCT image resolution.

Authors:  H Isaksson; J Töyräs; M Hakulinen; A S Aula; I Tamminen; P Julkunen; H Kröger; J S Jurvelin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Comparison of Different Decalcification Methods Using Rat Mandibles as a Model.

Authors:  Flavia M Savi; Gary I Brierly; Jeremy Baldwin; Christina Theodoropoulos; Maria A Woodruff
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  In vivo micro-CT scanning of a rabbit distal femur: repeatability and reproducibility.

Authors:  Michael J Voor; Shuo Yang; Robert L Burden; Seid W Waddell
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The role of activation functions 1 and 2 of estrogen receptor-α for the effects of estradiol and selective estrogen receptor modulators in male mice.

Authors:  Anna E Börjesson; Helen H Farman; Cecilia Engdahl; Antti Koskela; Klara Sjögren; Jenny M Kindblom; Alexandra Stubelius; Ulrika Islander; Hans Carlsten; Maria Cristina Antal; Andrée Krust; Pierre Chambon; Juha Tuukkanen; Marie K Lagerquist; Sara H Windahl; Claes Ohlsson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Three-dimensional surface texture visualization of bone tissue through epifluorescence-based serial block face imaging.

Authors:  C R Slyfield; K E Niemeyer; E V Tkachenko; R E Tomlinson; G G Steyer; C G Patthanacharoenphon; G J Kazakia; D L Wilson; C J Hernandez
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  Specimen size and porosity can introduce error into microCT-based tissue mineral density measurements.

Authors:  Roberto J Fajardo; Esther Cory; Nipun D Patel; Ara Nazarian; Andres Laib; Rajaram K Manoharan; James E Schmitz; Jeremy M DeSilva; Laura M MacLatchy; Brian D Snyder; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.