Literature DB >> 15355394

Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing.

Mark Bischof1, Rabah Nedir, Serge Szmukler-Moncler, Jean-Pierre Bernard, Jacky Samson.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was (1) to measure the primary stability of ITI implants placed in both jaws and determine the factors that affect the implant stability quotient (ISQ) determined by the resonance frequency method and (2) to monitor implant stability during the first 3 months of healing and evaluate any difference between immediately loaded (IL) implants and standard delayed loaded (DL) implants. The IL and DL groups consisted of 18 patients/63 implants and 18 patients/43 implants. IL implants were loaded after 2 days; DL implants were left to heal according to the one-stage procedure. The ISQ was recorded with an Osstell apparatus (Integration Diagnostics AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) at implant placement, after 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks. Primary stability was affected by the jaw and the bone type. The ISQ was higher in the mandible (59.8+/-6.7) than the maxilla (55.0+/-6.8). The ISQ was significantly higher in type I bone (62.8+/-7.2) than in type III bone (56.0+/-7.8). The implant position, implant length, implant diameter and implant deepening (esthetic plus implants) did not affect primary stability. After 3 months, the gain in stability was higher in the mandible than in the maxilla. The influence of bone type was leveled off and bone quality did not affect implant stability. The resonance-frequency analysis method did not reveal any difference in implant stability between the IL and DL implants over the healing period. Implant stability remained constant or increased slightly during the first 4-6 weeks and then increased more markedly. One DL and IL implant failed; both were 8 mm long placed in type III bone. At the 1-year control, the survival rate of the IL and the DL implants was 98.4% and 97.7%, respectively. This study showed no difference in implant stability between the IL and DL procedures over the first 3 months. IL short-span bridges placed in the posterior region and full arch rehabilitation of the maxilla with ITI sandblasted-and-etched implants were highly predictable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15355394     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01042.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  47 in total

1.  Clinical study on the primary stability of two dental implant systems with resonance frequency analysis.

Authors:  Annette Rabel; Steffen Gerhard Köhler; Andrea Maria Schmidt-Westhausen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Bone healing after dental extractions in irradiated patients: a pilot study on a novel technique for volume assessment of healing tooth sockets.

Authors:  Jimoh Olubanwo Agbaje; Reinhilde Jacobs; Katleen Michiels; Mahmoud Abu-Ta'a; Daniel van Steenberghe
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Immediate vs non-immediate loading post-extractive implants: a comparative study of implant stability quotient (ISQ).

Authors:  L Milillo; C Fiandaca; F Giannoulis; L Ottria; A Lucchese; F Silvestre; M Petruzzi
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

4.  Stability of dental implants after irradiation with an 830-nm low-level laser: a double-blind randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Joelle Marie García-Morales; Pedro Tortamano-Neto; Francisco Fernando Todescan; José Carlos Silva de Andrade; Juliana Marotti; Denise Maria Zezell
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Spectrum of indications for palatal implants in treatment concepts involving immediate and conventional loading.

Authors:  Britta A Jung; Winfried Harzer; Tomasz Gedrange; Martin Kunkel; Maximilian Moergel; Peter Diedrich; Gabriele Lüdicke; Heiner Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Immediate versus conventional loading of palatal implants in humans: a first report of a multicenter RCT.

Authors:  Britta A Jung; Winfried Harzer; Heinrich Wehrbein; Tomasz Gedrange; Werner Hopfenmüller; Gabriele Lüdicke; Maximilian Moergel; Peter Diedrich; Martin Kunkel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Measurements of Implant Stability Following Sinus Lift: A Pilot Clinical Study.

Authors:  Muhamed Ajanović; Alma Kamber-Ćesir; Adis Hamzić; Selma Tosum
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2015-09

8.  Evaluation of the correlation between insertion torque and primary stability of dental implants using a block bone test.

Authors:  Dorjpalam Bayarchimeg; Hee Namgoong; Byung Kook Kim; Myung Duk Kim; Sungtae Kim; Tae-Il Kim; Yang Jo Seol; Yong Moo Lee; Young Ku; In-Chul Rhyu; Eun Hee Lee; Ki-Tae Koo
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 9.  Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants.

Authors:  Po-Chun Chang; Niklaus P Lang; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Short Dental Implants (≤8.5 mm) versus Standard Dental Implants (≥10 mm): A One-Year Post-Loading Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Guillermo Pardo-Zamora; Antonio José Ortiz-Ruíz; Fabio Camacho-Alonso; José Francisco Martínez-Marco; Juan Manuel Molina-González; Núria Piqué-Clusella; Ascensión Vicente-Hernández
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.