Literature DB >> 20676814

Spectrum of indications for palatal implants in treatment concepts involving immediate and conventional loading.

Britta A Jung1, Winfried Harzer, Tomasz Gedrange, Martin Kunkel, Maximilian Moergel, Peter Diedrich, Gabriele Lüdicke, Heiner Wehrbein.   

Abstract

AIM: To analyze the spectrum of indications for second-generation palatal implants in relation to two different loading concepts in a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients were recruited to the study from 2006 to 2009. All implants (Orthosystem, Straumann, Basel, Switzerland; dimensions: 4.1 mm x 4.2 mm) were inserted in the median or paramedian region of the anterior palate, and each patient was randomized to one of two loading groups (immediate loading within the first week after insertion versus conventional loading after a 12-week healing phase). In this interim evaluation, we report preliminary results obtained six months after functional loading.
RESULTS: All palatal implants were primarily stable at the time of insertion. One implant loss (12 weeks after surgical insertion) was documented in the cohort subjected to conventional loading, and one patient dropped out of the immediate-loading group. At the time of this investigation, 39 palatal implants are experiencing functional loads. Using both loading concepts, we had various orthodontic objectives, such as intrusion of anterior and/or posterior teeth, and the mesialization and distalization of posterior teeth. Both loading groups presented nearly identical indications, and the distribution of direct vs. indirect anchorage forms was also very similar during the active treatment.
CONCLUSION: Comparison of the two treatment concepts revealed no clinical differences in implant stability. Patients undergoing immediate-loading therapy were subject to no limitations regarding indications at 6 months after functional loading compared with the patients who experienced conventional loading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20676814     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-010-1007-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  17 in total

1.  Short epithetic implants for orthodontic anchorage in the paramedian region of the palate. A clinical study.

Authors:  T Bernhart; J Freudenthaler; O Dörtbudak; H P Bantleon; G Watzek
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Orthodontic palatal implants: clinical technique.

Authors:  D Tinsley; J J O'Dwyer; P E Benson; P T Doyle; J Sandler
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2004-03

3.  Ninety percent success in palatal implants loaded 1 week after placement: a clinical evaluation by resonance frequency analysis.

Authors:  Adriano Giacomo Crismani; Thomas Bernhart; Kerstin Schwarz; Ales Gaetano Celar; Hans-Peter Bantleon; Georg Watzek
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Immediate function with NobelPerfect implants in the anterior dental arch.

Authors:  Robert Noelken; Thomas Morbach; Martin Kunkel; Wilfried Wagner
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  New method of temporary rehabilitation after traumatic tooth loss in a juvenile patient: a case report.

Authors:  Peter Göllner; Britta A Jung; Heinrich Wehrbein; Thomas Liechti
Journal:  Dent Traumatol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  [Bone-supported rapid maxillary expansion with an implant-borne Hyrax screw: the Dresden Distractor].

Authors:  Eve Tausche; Lars Hansen; Matthias Schneider; Winfried Harzer
Journal:  Orthod Fr       Date:  2008-05-29

7.  Success rate of palatal orthodontic implants: a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Roland Männchen; Marc Schätzle
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Bone-to-implant contact of orthodontic implants in humans subjected to horizontal loading.

Authors:  H Wehrbein; B R Merz; C H Hämmerle; N P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Immediate vs. conventional loading of palatal implants in humans.

Authors:  Peter Göllner; Britta A Jung; Martin Kunkel; Thomas Liechti; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Early loading of plalatal implants (ortho-type II) a prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Britta A Jung; Heinrich Wehrbein; Werner Hopfenmüller; Winfried Harzer; Tomasz Gedrange; Peter Diedrich; Martin Kunkel
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods.

Authors:  Safa Jambi; Tanya Walsh; Jonathan Sandler; Philip E Benson; Richard M Skeggs; Kevin D O'Brien
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-08-19

2.  One palatal implant for skeletal anchorage--frequency and range of indications.

Authors:  Elena Krieger; Zeynep Yildizhan; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  A simplified approach to true molar intrusion.

Authors:  Stefanie Flieger; Thomas Ziebura; Johannes Kleinheinz; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  Mini-implants in the palatal slope--a retrospective analysis of implant survival and tissue reaction.

Authors:  Thomas Ziebura; Stefanie Flieger; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.151

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.