Literature DB >> 15348656

Bone cement or bone substitute augmentation of pedicle screws improves pullout strength in posterior spinal fixation.

S L Evans1, C M Hunt, S Ahuja.   

Abstract

Pedicle screws are widely used to fix posterior spinal implants. However, in some situations, such as at the ends of long constructs in scoliosis correction, the screws may pull out of the pedicles. This limits the use of pedicle screw fixation where bone quality is poor. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of using either a low-viscosity bone cement (Palacos LV) or a bone augmentation material (Cortoss) on the pullout strength of typical pedicle screws (5 mm USS Schanz screws). Ten lumbar calf vertebrae were implanted with pedicle screws. One screw was inserted as normal, and the contralateral screw was augmented with Palacos LV or Cortoss. A plate was then cemented to the posterior surface of each pedicle and the screws were pulled out using a tensile testing machine. The pullout strength of the non-augmented screws was 1203+/-260 N, while the pullout strength of the augmented screws was 1970+/-220 N (Palacos LV) and 2021+/-342 N (Cortoss). Both Palacos LV and Cortoss significantly increased the pullout strength (p=0.0213 and p=0.0029, respectively). There was no significant difference between the Palacos LV and Cortoss groups (p=0.79).

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 15348656     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021133819646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  8 in total

1.  Axial and tangential fixation strength of pedicle screws versus hooks in the thoracic spine in relation to bone mineral density.

Authors:  Lars Hackenberg; Thomas Link; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  J N Weinstein; B L Rydevik; W Rauschning
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Augmentation of anterior vertebral body screw fixation by an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute.

Authors:  B Bai; F J Kummer; J Spivak
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  A 20-year perspective on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone.

Authors:  T M Keaveny; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Neurological deterioration after cement injection into a vertebral body.

Authors:  R A Wilkes; J G Mackinnon; W G Thomas
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-01

6.  Increased pedicle screw pullout strength with vertebroplasty augmentation in osteoporotic spines.

Authors:  John S Sarzier; Avery J Evans; David W Cahill
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Hip screw augmentation with an in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement: an in vitro biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  D C Moore; E P Frankenburg; J A Goulet; S A Goldstein
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Effect of screw diameter, insertion technique, and bone cement augmentation of pedicular screw fixation strength.

Authors:  R H Wittenberg; K S Lee; M Shea; A A White; W C Hayes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.176

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Load bearing capacity of bone anchored fiber-reinforced composite device.

Authors:  Ahmed Mansour Ballo; Lippo V Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu; Timo O Närhi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-09       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Osteoblast proliferation and maturation on bioactive fiber-reinforced composite surface.

Authors:  Ahmed Mansour Ballo; Anne K Kokkari; Ville V Meretoja; Lippo L Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu; Timo O Narhi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Comparison between two pedicle screw augmentation instrumentations in adult degenerative scoliosis with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Yang Xie; Qiang Fu; Zi-qiang Chen; Zhi-cai Shi; Xiao-dong Zhu; Chuan-feng Wang; Ming Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model.

Authors:  Gorkem Kiyak; Tevfik Balikci; Ahmed Majid Heydar; Murat Bezer
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-02-07

5.  Surgical strategies to improve fixation in the osteoporotic spine: the effects of tapping, cement augmentation, and screw trajectory.

Authors:  Craig A Kuhns; Michael Reiter; Ferris Pfeiffer; Theodore J Choma
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2013-11-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.