Literature DB >> 15348520

Tensile force testing of optimized coin-shaped titanium implant attachment kinetics in the rabbit tibiae.

Hans Jacob Rønold1, Jan Eirik Ellingsen, Ståle Petter Lyngstadaas.   

Abstract

In the present study, the bone response of titanium implants at early bone healing stages, was evaluated using a tensile test. Test surface of coin-shaped cp. titanium implants were standardized by grit blasting with TiO(2), grain size 180-220 microm. The surface topography of the implant specimens was examined by SEM, and by a confocal laser scanner for evaluation of S(a), S(t) and S(dr). The implants were placed onto the leveled site on the tibia of 12 New Zealand White rabbits, 4 implants in each animal. The rabbits were divided into three groups with different observation times i.e. 2, 4 and 6 weeks. The retention of 12 implants were tested by measuring the pull-out force needed to detach the implant from the bone. There was a significant increase in implant retention from 2 to 4 and to 6 weeks healing time (p<0.05). Four implants from each time point were randomly chosen for histological evaluation. The histological appearance of the implant-bone interface at the different healing times showed noticeable differences in the degree of bone healing and maturation, suggesting that, in rabbits, 6 weeks healing time is a suitable observation point for tensile testing of surface optimized osseointegrating implants.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 15348520     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025622407727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  27 in total

1.  Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs.

Authors:  D Buser; T Nydegger; T Oxland; D L Cochran; R K Schenk; H P Hirt; D Snétivy; L P Nolte
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1999-05

2.  Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants.

Authors:  Dehua Li; Stephen J Ferguson; Thomas Beutler; David L Cochran; Caroline Sittig; Hans Peter Hirt; Daniel Buser
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002-05

3.  In vivo evaluation of bone-bonding of titanium metal chemically treated with a hydrogen peroxide solution containing tantalum chloride.

Authors:  S Kaneko; K Tsuru; S Hayakawa; S Takemoto; C Ohtsuki; T Ozaki; H Inoue; A Osaka
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs.

Authors:  D Buser; R K Schenk; S Steinemann; J P Fiorellini; C H Fox; H Stich
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1991-07

5.  Quantitative and qualitative investigations of surface enlarged titanium and titanium alloy implants.

Authors:  C H Han; C B Johansson; A Wennerberg; T Albrektsson
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Torque and histomorphometric evaluation of c.p. titanium screws blasted with 25- and 75-microns-sized particles of Al2O3.

Authors:  A Wennerberg; T Albrektsson; J Lausmaa
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1996-02

7.  Rate of pull-out strength gain of dual-etched titanium implants: a comparative study in rabbits.

Authors:  D Baker; R M London; R O'Neal
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Titanium metals form direct bonding to bone after alkali and heat treatments.

Authors:  S Nishiguchi; H Kato; H Fujita; M Oka; H M Kim; T Kokubo; T Nakamura
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  The effect of substrate roughness and hydroxyapatite coating thickness on implant shear strength.

Authors:  M Svehla; P Morberg; W Bruce; B Zicat; W R Walsh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark; H A Hansson; J Lindström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Is There a Better Biomaterial for Dental Implants than Titanium?-A Review and Meta-Study Analysis.

Authors:  Håvard J Haugen; Hongyu Chen
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-04-20

3.  Mitigation of peri-implantitis by rational design of bifunctional peptides with antimicrobial properties.

Authors:  E Cate Wisdom; Yan Zhou; Casey Chen; Candan Tamerler; Malcolm L Snead
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2019-09-24

4.  Repeatedly Applied Peptide Film Kills Bacteria on Dental Implants.

Authors:  Cate Wisdom; Casey Chen; Esra Yuca; Yan Zhou; Candan Tamerler; Malcolm L Snead
Journal:  JOM (1989)       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  Quantitative ultrasound assessment of the influence of roughness and healing time on osseointegration phenomena.

Authors:  M Fraulob; R Vayron; S Le Cann; B Lecuelle; Y Hériveaux; H Albini Lomami; C H Flouzat Lachaniette; G Haïat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction: A consequence of a fundamental principle of bone physiology.

Authors:  Stig Hansson; Anders Halldin
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2012-08-16

7.  Development of a quantitative preclinical screening model for implant osseointegration in rat tail vertebra.

Authors:  Sándor Farkasdi; Dávid Pammer; Róbert Rácz; Gergely Hriczó-Koperdák; Bence Tamás Szabó; Csaba Dobó-Nagy; Beáta Kerémi; József Blazsek; Frederic Cuisinier; Gang Wu; Gábor Varga
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.573

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.