Literature DB >> 15342755

Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Miller-Galante prosthesis.

Douglas Naudie1, Jeff Guerin, David A Parker, Robert B Bourne, Cecil H Rorabeck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has become a popular treatment alternative for osteoarthritis that is confined to the medial part of the knee. Excellent intermediate-term results recently have been reported in association with the Miller-Galante unicompartmental implant. The purpose of the present study was to report on our longer-term experience with the Miller-Galante medial unicompartmental knee implant.
METHODS: We evaluated the results of 113 medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties that had been performed with use of the Miller-Galante implant in eighty-four patients between 1989 and 2000. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was sixty-eight years. Forty-five patients were men, and thirty-nine were women. Thirteen patients (sixteen knees) died at a mean of seven years after the index arthroplasty. No patient was lost to follow-up. The remaining seventy-one patients (ninety-seven knees) were followed for a mean of ten years and were evaluated with use of the Knee Society clinical and radiographic rating system.
RESULTS: Eleven knees were revised at a mean of four years after the index procedure. The mean Knee Society knee and function scores for the sixty-one patients (eighty-six knees) who were living and who had not had a revision improved from 48 and 53 points preoperatively to 93 and 80 points at the time of the most recent evaluation. The five and ten-year rates of survival were 94% and 90%, respectively, with revision to tricompartmental knee arthroplasty as the end point and 93% and 86%, respectively, with revision or radiographic loosening as the end point.
CONCLUSIONS: The Miller-Galante medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty provided excellent pain relief and restoration of function in carefully selected patients and demonstrated durable implant survival at ten years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15342755     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200409000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  19 in total

1.  The impact of a high tibial valgus osteotomy and unicondylar medial arthroplasty on the treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gunter Spahn; Gunther O Hofmann; Lars Victor von Engelhardt; Mengxia Li; Henning Neubauer; Hans Michael Klinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Unicompartmental knee replacements with Miller-Galante prosthesis: two to 16-year follow-up of a single surgeon series.

Authors:  Joby John; C Mauffrey; Peter May
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Functional improvement after unicompartmental knee replacement: a follow-up study with a performance based knee test.

Authors:  Lucas L A Kleijn; Wouter L W van Hemert; Will G H Meijers; Arnold D M Kester; Lukas Lisowski; Bernd Grimm; Ide C Heyligers
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Long-term results with a lateral unicondylar replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Noël A Argenson; Sebastien Parratte; Antoine Bertani; Xavier Flecher; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sebastien Parratte; Vanessa Pauly; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac; Jean-Noel A Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Minimum 10-year follow-up results of ALPINA cementless hydroxyapatite-coated anatomic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  F Lecuire; J B Berard; S Martres
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-03-02

7.  [Medial unicondylar knee replacement].

Authors:  O Lorbach; D Pape; P Mosser; D Kohn; K Anagnostakos
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database analysis: is there a winner?

Authors:  Matthew C Lyons; Steven J MacDonald; Lyndsay E Somerville; Douglas D Naudie; Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Native rotational knee kinematics is restored after lateral UKA but not after medial UKA.

Authors:  Keizo Wada; Daisuke Hamada; Tomoya Takasago; Akihiro Nitta; Tomohiro Goto; Ichiro Tonogai; Yoshihiro Tsuruo; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Simultaneous ipsilateral knee arthroscopy and unicondylar knee arthroplasty is effective for bicompartmental symptoms.

Authors:  Akshay Lakra; Taylor Murtaugh; Jeffrey A Geller; William Macaulay; Roshan P Shah
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.