Literature DB >> 23456088

Minimum 10-year follow-up results of ALPINA cementless hydroxyapatite-coated anatomic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

F Lecuire1, J B Berard, S Martres.   

Abstract

One hundred and one unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA) were done between 1996 and 2000 with ALPINA(®) UNI, a cementless hydroxyapatite-coated anatomic prosthesis. Sixty-five knees were available for the long-term follow-up at a mean of 11 years. The mean IKS improved from 119.3 ± 16.8 points preoperatively to 171.4 ± 25.3 at the latest follow-up (p < 0.0001). Eighty-nine percentage of the knees were rated good and excellent. The mean knee flexion has significantly improved from 120°5 preoperatively to 127°3 at the latest follow-up (p < 0.01). Eleven revision procedures were done: 1 for early knee degeneration on rheumatoid arthritis, 1 for degeneration of osteoarthritis in the opposite compartment of the knee, 1 for unexplained pain and 1 for late ACL rupture, all these 4 cases were replaced by total knee arthroplasties; 3 revisions by another UKA were done due to polyethylene insert fracture; and 4 partial revision were done for bearing exchange due to severe polyethylene wear. When revision for any reason was defined as the end point, the 13-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 88 % (95 % CI 81-95 %) and when revision due to implant mechanical failure (excluding degeneration of osteoarthritis in the opposite compartment of the knee and bearing exchange only) was defined as the end point, the 13-year survival rate was 94 % (95 % CI 89.1-99.1 %).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23456088     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-013-1192-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  21 in total

1.  Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series.

Authors:  U C Svärd; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

2.  Early failure of the porous-coated anatomic cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A 5- to 9-year follow-up study.

Authors:  A D Skyrme; M M Mencia; P W Skinner
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement survivorship and clinical experience over 21 years.

Authors:  T Ashraf; J H Newman; R L Evans; C E Ackroyd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-11

4.  Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry.

Authors:  Terence J Gioe; Kathleen K Killeen; Daniel P Hoeffel; Jack M Bert; Thomas K Comfort; Karen Scheltema; Susan Mehle; Katherine Grimm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: survivorship and technical considerations at an average follow-up of 12.4 years.

Authors:  Donald W Pennington; John J Swienckowski; William B Lutes; Gregory N Drake
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study.

Authors:  S Lewold; O Robertsson; K Knutson; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1998-10

7.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Ten- to 13-year follow-up study.

Authors:  L Marmor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The radiolucent line beneath the tibial components of the Oxford meniscal knee.

Authors:  S B Tibrewal; K A Grant; J W Goodfellow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1984-08

9.  Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Richard A Berger; R Michael Meneghini; Joshua J Jacobs; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Hang; Tyman E Stanford; Stephen E Graves; David C Davidson; Richard N de Steiger; Lisa N Miller
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  6 in total

1.  High rate of implant loosening for uncemented resurfacing-type medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Iacono; Laura Bragonzoni; Mirco Lo Presti; Maria Pia Neri; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Marco Nitri; Giovanni Raspugli; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Outcomes of cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: review of recent literature.

Authors:  M Basso; E Arnaldi; A A M Bruno; M Formica
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-06-26

Review 3.  Cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Campi; H G Pandit; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Five-year experience of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  H G Pandit; S Campi; T W Hamilton; O D Dada; S Pollalis; C Jenkins; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Ten-Year Survivorship, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Satisfaction of a Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryland Kagan; Mike B Anderson; Travis Bailey; Aaron A Hofmann; Christopher E Pelt
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-04-06

Review 6.  Comparable incidence of periprosthetic tibial fractures in cementless and cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joost A Burger; Tjeerd Jager; Matthew S Dooley; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.342

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.