Literature DB >> 15341979

Psychological distress in women at increased risk for breast cancer: the role of risk perception.

Silvia van Dooren1, Adriana J Rijnsburger, Caroline Seynaeve, Hugo J Duivenvoorden, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst, Harry J de Koning, Aad Tibben.   

Abstract

The magnetic resonance imaging screening (MRISC) study evaluates a surveillance programme for women with a hereditary risk for breast cancer. The psychological burden of surveillance in these women may depend on inaccurate risk perceptions. To examine differences in risk perceptions between three predefined risk categories and associations with psychological distress. BC-specific distress, general distress, and RP (cognitive and affective) were assessed, two months before a surveillance appointment. Cumulative lifetime risk (CLTR) of developing breast cancer was trichotomised into: (1) CLTR of 60-85% (mutation carriers), (2) CLTR of 30-50%, and (3) CLTR of 15-30%. In a total group of 351 women (mean age 40.5 years, range 21-63 years) the three risk categories significantly differed in their accuracy of assessing cognitive risk perceptions. In category 1, 60% had an accurate risk perceptions, in category 2, 43.7% and in category 3, 33.3%. Overestimators reported significantly more breast cancer-specific distress. After adding affective risk perception to the model, this effect disappeared. Affective risk perceptions showed significant associations with breast cancer-specific and general distress. Affective risk perception is a more important determinant for psychological distress than cognitive risk perception. This knowledge should be used during surveillance appointments in order to improve and individualise support for these women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15341979     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  15 in total

1.  Perceived risk, trust and health-related quality of life among cancer survivors.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Neeraj K Arora; William M P Klein; Paul K J Han
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2010-02

2.  Measuring psychological consequences of screening: adaptation of the psychological consequences questionnaire into Dutch.

Authors:  A J Rijnsburger; M L Essink-Bot; E van As; J Cockburn; H J de Koning
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Risk perception, worry and satisfaction related to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  Cathrine Bjorvatn; Geir Egil Eide; Berit Rokne Hanestad; Nina Øyen; Odd E Havik; Anniken Carlsson; Gunilla Berglund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Intuition versus cognition: a qualitative exploration of how women understand and manage their increased breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Louise Heiniger; Phyllis N Butow; Margaret Charles; Melanie A Price
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-03-28

5.  Objective and subjective breast cancer risk: relationships with natural killer cell activity and psychological distress in healthy women.

Authors:  Na-Jin Park; Duck-Hee Kang; Michael T Weaver
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.592

6.  Does family communication matter? Exploring knowledge of breast cancer genetics in cancer families.

Authors:  Deborah O Himes; Sarah H Davis; Jane H Lassetter; Neil E Peterson; Margaret F Clayton; Wendy C Birmingham; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-03-15

7.  Randomized Controlled Trial of an Educational Intervention Using an Online Risk Calculator for Knee Osteoarthritis: Effect on Risk Perception.

Authors:  Elena Losina; Griffin L Michl; Karen C Smith; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 4.794

8.  CT scan screening is associated with increased distress among subjects of the APExS.

Authors:  Christophe Paris; Marion Maurel; Amandine Luc; Audrey Stoufflet; Jean-Claude Pairon; Marc Letourneux
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Risk perception among women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Robert Pilarski
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Risk perception after genetic counseling in patients with increased risk of cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Rantala; Ulla Platten; Gunilla Lindgren; Bo Nilsson; Brita Arver; Annika Lindblom; Yvonne Brandberg
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 2.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.