Na-Jin Park1, Duck-Hee Kang, Michael T Weaver. 1. School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Ave S., Birmingham, AL 35294-1210, USA. najinp@uab.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) risk, based on either known risk factors (objective) or self-assessment (subjective), may influence natural killer cell activity (NKCA) directly or through psychological distress. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to examine the relationships of objective and subjective BC risks with NKCA and a mediating role of psychological distress in a community sample of healthy women. METHODS: In a cross-sectional descriptive study, a convenience sample of 117 healthy women (mean age, 36.5 years) completed questionnaires for BC risk and psychological distress and provided blood for NKCA measurement. RESULTS: Objective and subjective BC risks were positively correlated (P < .001). Regression analyses revealed that objective BC risk had a significant negative relationship with NKCA at the 12.5:1 effector-to-target cell ratio (P = .011), whereas subjective risk was not associated with NKCA at any effector-to-target cell ratio tested. Only subjective risk had a positive association with both BC-specific (P = .002) and general (P < .001) psychological distress. Psychological distress failed to mediate the relationship between subjective risk and NKCA. CONCLUSIONS: Objective BC risk had a limited but significant relationship with NKCA. Subjective risk was highly associated with psychological distress but was not associated with NKCA. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Despite the limited relationships between BC risk and NKCA, the impact of BC risk on other tumor defense mechanisms needs to be further explored. Collective findings in this area will suggest early preventive strategies for monitoring BC risk and maintaining better tumor defense in healthy women.
BACKGROUND:Breast cancer (BC) risk, based on either known risk factors (objective) or self-assessment (subjective), may influence natural killer cell activity (NKCA) directly or through psychological distress. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to examine the relationships of objective and subjective BC risks with NKCA and a mediating role of psychological distress in a community sample of healthy women. METHODS: In a cross-sectional descriptive study, a convenience sample of 117 healthy women (mean age, 36.5 years) completed questionnaires for BC risk and psychological distress and provided blood for NKCA measurement. RESULTS: Objective and subjective BC risks were positively correlated (P < .001). Regression analyses revealed that objective BC risk had a significant negative relationship with NKCA at the 12.5:1 effector-to-target cell ratio (P = .011), whereas subjective risk was not associated with NKCA at any effector-to-target cell ratio tested. Only subjective risk had a positive association with both BC-specific (P = .002) and general (P < .001) psychological distress. Psychological distress failed to mediate the relationship between subjective risk and NKCA. CONCLUSIONS: Objective BC risk had a limited but significant relationship with NKCA. Subjective risk was highly associated with psychological distress but was not associated with NKCA. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Despite the limited relationships between BC risk and NKCA, the impact of BC risk on other tumor defense mechanisms needs to be further explored. Collective findings in this area will suggest early preventive strategies for monitoring BC risk and maintaining better tumor defense in healthy women.
Authors: Frank Baker; Maxine Denniston; James Zabora; Adrienne Polland; William N Dudley Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Suzanne M Miller; Deborah J Bowen; Marci K Campbell; Michael A Diefenbach; Ellen R Gritz; Paul B Jacobsen; Michael Stefanek; Carolyn Y Fang; DeAnn Lazovich; Kerry A Sherman; Catharine Wang Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Joel Erblich; Guy H Montgomery; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Marylene Cloitre; Dana H Bovbjerg Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Karen Kaiser; Kenzie A Cameron; Jennifer Beaumont; Sofia F Garcia; Leilani Lacson; Margaret Moran; Lindsey Karavites; Chiara Rodgers; Swati Kulkarni; Nora M Hansen; Seema A Khan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 4.872