Literature DB >> 20562616

Objective and subjective breast cancer risk: relationships with natural killer cell activity and psychological distress in healthy women.

Na-Jin Park1, Duck-Hee Kang, Michael T Weaver.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) risk, based on either known risk factors (objective) or self-assessment (subjective), may influence natural killer cell activity (NKCA) directly or through psychological distress.
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to examine the relationships of objective and subjective BC risks with NKCA and a mediating role of psychological distress in a community sample of healthy women.
METHODS: In a cross-sectional descriptive study, a convenience sample of 117 healthy women (mean age, 36.5 years) completed questionnaires for BC risk and psychological distress and provided blood for NKCA measurement.
RESULTS: Objective and subjective BC risks were positively correlated (P < .001). Regression analyses revealed that objective BC risk had a significant negative relationship with NKCA at the 12.5:1 effector-to-target cell ratio (P = .011), whereas subjective risk was not associated with NKCA at any effector-to-target cell ratio tested. Only subjective risk had a positive association with both BC-specific (P = .002) and general (P < .001) psychological distress. Psychological distress failed to mediate the relationship between subjective risk and NKCA.
CONCLUSIONS: Objective BC risk had a limited but significant relationship with NKCA. Subjective risk was highly associated with psychological distress but was not associated with NKCA. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Despite the limited relationships between BC risk and NKCA, the impact of BC risk on other tumor defense mechanisms needs to be further explored. Collective findings in this area will suggest early preventive strategies for monitoring BC risk and maintaining better tumor defense in healthy women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20562616      PMCID: PMC2957516          DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181dc37a1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Nurs        ISSN: 0162-220X            Impact factor:   2.592


  46 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Event Scale: psychometric properties.

Authors:  Eva C Sundin; Mardi J Horowitz
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.319

2.  Use of coefficient of variation in assessing variability of quantitative assays.

Authors:  George F Reed; Freyja Lynn; Bruce D Meade
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2002-11

3.  A POMS short form for cancer patients: psychometric and structural evaluation.

Authors:  Frank Baker; Maxine Denniston; James Zabora; Adrienne Polland; William N Dudley
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Maria C Katapodi; Kathy A Lee; Noreen C Facione; Marylin J Dodd
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Current research promises and challenges in behavioral oncology: report from the American Society of Preventive Oncology annual meeting, 2002.

Authors:  Suzanne M Miller; Deborah J Bowen; Marci K Campbell; Michael A Diefenbach; Ellen R Gritz; Paul B Jacobsen; Michael Stefanek; Carolyn Y Fang; DeAnn Lazovich; Kerry A Sherman; Catharine Wang
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Biased cognitive processing of cancer-related information among women with family histories of breast cancer: evidence from a cancer stroop task.

Authors:  Joel Erblich; Guy H Montgomery; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Marylene Cloitre; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 7.  Identifying and counseling women at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Deborah J Rhodes
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Psychological stress and the human immune system: a meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry.

Authors:  Suzanne C Segerstrom; Gregory E Miller
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 9.  Influence of alcohol consumption on immunological status: a review.

Authors:  L E Díaz; A Montero; M González-Gross; A I Vallejo; J Romeo; A Marcos
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Increased emotional distress in daughters of breast cancer patients is associated with decreased natural cytotoxic activity, elevated levels of stress hormones and decreased secretion of Th1 cytokines.

Authors:  Miri Cohen; Ehud Klein; Abraham Kuten; Geta Fried; Oren Zinder; Shimon Pollack
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-07-20       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  1 in total

1.  What does risk of future cancer mean to breast cancer patients?

Authors:  Karen Kaiser; Kenzie A Cameron; Jennifer Beaumont; Sofia F Garcia; Leilani Lacson; Margaret Moran; Lindsey Karavites; Chiara Rodgers; Swati Kulkarni; Nora M Hansen; Seema A Khan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.872

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.