Literature DB >> 15338446

Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fail to show understanding of means-end connections in a string-pulling task.

Britta Osthaus1, Stephen E G Lea, Alan M Slater.   

Abstract

Domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) were tested in four experiments for their understanding of means-end connections. In each of the experiments, the dogs attempted to retrieve a food treat that could be seen behind a barrier and which was connected, via string, to a within-reach wooden block. In the experiments, either one or two strings were present, but the treat was attached only to one string. Successful retrieval of the treat required the animals to pull the appropriate string (either by pawing or by grasping the wooden block in their jaws) until the treat emerged from under the barrier. The results showed that the dogs were successful if the treat was in a perpendicular line to the barrier, i.e. straight ahead, but not when the string was at an angle: in the latter condition, the typical response was a proximity error in that the dogs pawed or mouthed at a location closest in line to the treat. When two strings that crossed were present, the dogs tended to pull on the wrong string. The combined results from the experiments show that, although dogs can learn to pull on a string to obtain food, they do not spontaneously understand means-end connections involving strings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15338446     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-004-0230-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  21 in total

1.  Dogs are able to solve a means-end task.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Marleen Hentrup; Zsófia Virányi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Investigation of cognitive mechanisms and strategy on solving multiple string-pulling problems in Azure-winged magpie (Cyanopica cyanus).

Authors:  Lin Wang; Dujing Zhang; Jinling Sui
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Domestication has not affected the understanding of means-end connections in dogs.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Helene Möslinger; Zs Virányi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Searching high and low: domestic dogs' understanding of solidity.

Authors:  Julia Espinosa; Emma C Tecwyn; Daphna Buchsbaum
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Pulling to scale: Motor planning for sequences of repeated actions by cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Authors:  Kate M Chapman; Daniel J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2013-04

6.  An investigation into the cognition behind spontaneous string pulling in New Caledonian crows.

Authors:  Alex H Taylor; Felipe S Medina; Jennifer C Holzhaider; Lindsay J Hearne; Gavin R Hunt; Russell D Gray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Dogs (Canis familiaris) can learn to attend to connectivity in string pulling tasks.

Authors:  Stefanie Riemer; Corsin Müller; Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Pigeons process actor-action configurations more readily than bystander-action configurations.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Performance on patterned string problems by common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Matthew Gagne; Kathryn Levesque; Lauren Nutile; Charles Locurto
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Dogs' use of the solidity principle: revisited.

Authors:  Corsin A Müller; Stefanie Riemer; Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.