Literature DB >> 32638171

Investigation of cognitive mechanisms and strategy on solving multiple string-pulling problems in Azure-winged magpie (Cyanopica cyanus).

Lin Wang1, Dujing Zhang1, Jinling Sui2.   

Abstract

String-pulling tasks are a widely used paradigm in animal cognition research. The present study tested whether ten azure-winged magpies (Cyanopica cyanus) could solve a series of multiple-strings problems with the aim of systematically investigating which rules this species uses to solve different-patterned string tasks, i.e., tasks in which subjects have to choose between two strings only one of which is connected to bait. When the subjects faced the parallel strings task (T1), five birds (C3, C5, C8, C9, and C10) were able to solve the task and acted in a goal-directed manner. Three birds (C5, C8, and C9) successfully solved the oblique parallel strings task (T3). The azure-winged magpies exhibited proximity selection in the oblique parallel strings task (C1 and C4 in T2), and the task with one string folded at a right angle (C3, C6 and C8 in T5). Several subjects also performed simple strategies in other unresolved tasks, e.g., random selection, trial-and-error learning, and side bias strategies (i.e., a certain degree of "left-handed" tendency). These results demonstrated that the azure-winged magpie possesses the potential to solve simple multiple-string tasks, although when faced with more difficult problems they could not solve them.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognition ability; Corvids; Goal-directed manner; Side bias strategy; String-pulling task

Year:  2020        PMID: 32638171     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-020-01413-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  15 in total

1.  Quantitative development of brain and brain structures in birds (galliformes and passeriformes) compared to that in mammals (insectivores and primates).

Authors:  G Rehkämper; H D Frahm; K Zilles
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 2.  The string-pulling paradigm in comparative psychology.

Authors:  Ivo F Jacobs; Mathias Osvath
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain.

Authors:  Seweryn Olkowicz; Martin Kocourek; Radek K Lučan; Michal Porteš; W Tecumseh Fitch; Suzana Herculano-Houzel; Pavel Němec
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Brains matter, bodies maybe not: the case for examining neuron numbers irrespective of body size.

Authors:  Suzana Herculano-Houzel
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fail to show understanding of means-end connections in a string-pulling task.

Authors:  Britta Osthaus; Stephen E G Lea; Alan M Slater
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 6.  Neuronal factors determining high intelligence.

Authors:  Ursula Dicke; Gerhard Roth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Interspecific allometry of the brain and brain regions in parrots (psittaciformes): comparisons with other birds and primates.

Authors:  Andrew N Iwaniuk; Karen M Dean; John E Nelson
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Cellular scaling rules for the brain of Artiodactyla include a highly folded cortex with few neurons.

Authors:  Rodrigo S Kazu; José Maldonado; Bruno Mota; Paul R Manger; Suzana Herculano-Houzel
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.856

9.  Proactive prosociality in a cooperatively breeding corvid, the azure-winged magpie (Cyanopica cyana).

Authors:  Lisa Horn; Clara Scheer; Thomas Bugnyar; Jorg J M Massen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica) solve multiple-string problems by the spatial relation of string and reward.

Authors:  M M Hofmann; L G Cheke; N S Clayton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.