Literature DB >> 22576582

Performance on patterned string problems by common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Matthew Gagne1, Kathryn Levesque, Lauren Nutile, Charles Locurto.   

Abstract

This experiment examined the performance of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) on a series of patterned string problems to assess the marmosets' understanding of means-ends relationships. One marmoset, Jet, was exposed to a series of problems that were ordered in terms of perceived difficulty during two testings that were separated by 1 year. In the second testing, Jet received problems that had been used during the first testing along with three new problems. Each of the new problems was designed to be an exemplar of the type of problem that Jet had experienced difficulty with in the first testing. A second marmoset, Peaches, was tested on the same set of problems given to Jet in the second testing. Results indicated that the marmosets' performance on these problems fell into three categories. In one category, some problems were solved without evidence of trial-and-error learning. In a second category, there were problems in which the marmosets responded at chance levels initially but evidenced improvement as a function of extended testing. In a third category, some problems appeared to be virtually unsolvable even with extended testing. Taken together, these results indicate that the marmosets were able to learn the means-ends connection between pulling a string and obtaining food. This learning was best characterized as a trial-and-error process for some problem forms, while for others there appeared to be rapid learning that did not require extensive practice. The instances of rapid learning may be the result of the application of a simple spatial proximity rule in which the marmosets chose the string that was closest to an imaginary line drawn between the marmoset and the reinforcer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22576582      PMCID: PMC3425667          DOI: 10.1007/s10071-012-0511-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  13 in total

1.  The role of motivational factors in insightful problem-solving.

Authors:  H G BIRCH
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1945       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 2.  Technical intelligence in animals: the kea model.

Authors:  Ludwig Huber; Gyula K Gajdon
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Problem solving and functional design features: experiments on cotton-top tamarins, Saguinus oedipus oedipus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  A study of problem solving by gibbons.

Authors:  B B Beck
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 1.991

5.  What guides a search for food that has disappeared? Experiments on cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Authors:  M D Hauser; T Williams; J D Kralik; D Moskovitz
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fail to show understanding of means-end connections in a string-pulling task.

Authors:  Britta Osthaus; Stephen E G Lea; Alan M Slater
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  'Insight' in the pigeon: antecedents and determinants of an intelligent performance.

Authors:  R Epstein; C E Kirshnit; R P Lanza; L C Rubin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Mar 1-7       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Domestic cats (Felis catus) do not show causal understanding in a string-pulling task.

Authors:  Emma Whitt; Marie Douglas; Britta Osthaus; Ian Hocking
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  An investigation into the cognition behind spontaneous string pulling in New Caledonian crows.

Authors:  Alex H Taylor; Felipe S Medina; Jennifer C Holzhaider; Lindsay J Hearne; Gavin R Hunt; Russell D Gray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Can wild common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) solve the parallel strings task?

Authors:  L G Halsey; B M Bezerra; A S Souto
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  7 in total

1.  Exclusion in the field: wild brown skuas find hidden food in the absence of visual information.

Authors:  Samara Danel; Jules Chiffard-Carricaburu; Francesco Bonadonna; Anna P Nesterova
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Dogs (Canis familiaris) can learn to attend to connectivity in string pulling tasks.

Authors:  Stefanie Riemer; Corsin Müller; Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica) solve multiple-string problems by the spatial relation of string and reward.

Authors:  M M Hofmann; L G Cheke; N S Clayton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Of Men and Mice: Modeling the Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Regina Dahlhaus
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 5.639

5.  Azure-winged magpies solve string-pulling tasks by partial understanding of the physical cognition.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Yunchao Luo; Xin Wang; Abudusaimaiti Maierdiyali; Hao Chang; Zhongqiu Li
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.624

6.  String-pulling in the Goffin's cockatoo (Cacatua goffiniana).

Authors:  Birgit Wakonig; Alice M I Auersperg; Mark O'Hara
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Patterned-string tasks: relation between fine motor skills and visual-spatial abilities in parrots.

Authors:  Anastasia Krasheninnikova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.