Literature DB >> 15330704

Attentional pursuit is faster than attentional saccade.

Todd S Horowitz1, Alex O Holcombe, Jeremy M Wolfe, Helga C Arsenio, Jennifer S DiMase.   

Abstract

How quickly can we shift the focus of visual attention? We compared the rates of two types of attentional shifts: attentional saccades (shifts between objects) and attentional pursuit (shifts along with a moving object). Instead of measuring the time required for a single shift, which confounds shift time with cue interpretation time, we measured the pace at which observers could make multiple successive shifts in a predictable order. We find that successive attentional saccades between objects are quite slow (300-500 ms). The object-based theory of attention predicts that attention should shift between locations more quickly when in pursuit of a moving object. Our results support this theory. Attentional pursuit is substantially faster--taking only 200-250 ms to cover the same distance. "Indexing" a moving object (keeping track of one object) can be done at even faster rates, supporting a distinction between attending to and indexing objects.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15330704     DOI: 10.1167/4.7.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  13 in total

1.  Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Brianna M Eiter; Ralph Radach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Temporal overlap in the linguistic processing of successive words in reading: reply to Pollatsek, Reichle, and Rayner (2006a).

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Ralph Radach; Brianna Eiter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Perceptual modulation of motor--but not visual--responses in the frontal eye field during an urgent-decision task.

Authors:  M Gabriela Costello; Dantong Zhu; Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  On the evolution of conscious attention.

Authors:  Harry Haroutioun Haladjian; Carlos Montemayor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

5.  Remapping attention in multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Piers D L Howe; Trafton Drew; Yair Pinto; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Delineating the neural signatures of tracking spatial position and working memory during attentive tracking.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The coordinate systems used in visual tracking.

Authors:  Piers D L Howe; Yair Pinto; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Rapid volitional control of apparent motion during percept generation.

Authors:  Julia A Mossbridge; Laura Ortega; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Stream/bounce event perception reveals a temporal limit of motion correspondence based on surface feature over space and time.

Authors:  Yousuke Kawachi; Takahiro Kawabe; Jiro Gyoba
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-07-18

10.  The spatial and temporal deployment of voluntary attention across the visual field.

Authors:  Guilhem Ibos; Jean-René Duhamel; Suliann Ben Hamed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.