Literature DB >> 15330038

Does the femur roll-back with flexion?

V Pinskerova1, P Johal, S Nakagawa, A Sosna, A Williams, W Gedroyc, M A R Freeman.   

Abstract

MRI studies of the knee were performed at intervals between full extension and 120 degrees of flexion in six cadavers and also non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing in five volunteers. At each interval sagittal images were obtained through both compartments on which the position of the femoral condyle, identified by the centre of its posterior circular surface which is termed the flexion facet centre (FFC), and the point of closest approximation between the femoral and tibial subchondral plates, the contact point (CP), were identified relative to the posterior tibial cortex. The movements of the CP and FFC were essentially the same in the three groups but in all three the medial differed from the lateral compartment and the movement of the FFC differed from that of the CR Medially from 30 degrees to 120 degrees the FFC and CP coincided and did not move anteroposteriorly. From 30 degrees to 0 degrees the anteroposterior position of the FFC remained unchanged but the CP moved forwards by about 15 mm. Laterally, the FFC and the CP moved backwards together by about 15 mm from 20 degrees to 120 degrees. From 20 degrees to full extension both the FFC and CP moved forwards, but the latter moved more than the former. The differences between the movements of the FFC and the CP could be explained by the sagittal shapes of the bones, especially anteriorly. The term 'roll-back' can be applied to solid bodies, e.g. the condyles, but not to areas. The lateral femoral condyle does roll-back with flexion but the medial does not, i.e. the femur rotates externally around a medial centre. By contrast, both the medial and lateral contact points move back, roughly in parallel, from 0 degrees to 120 degrees but they cannot 'roll'. Femoral roll-back with flexion, usually imagined as backward rolling of both condyles, does not occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15330038     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.14589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  47 in total

1.  Upright weight-bearing CT of the knee during flexion: changes of the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral articulations between 0° and 120°.

Authors:  Anna Hirschmann; Florian M Buck; Ramin Herschel; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Use of TT-PCL versus TT-TG.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Brady; Adam S Rosencrans; Beth E Shubin Stein
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

3.  The 3D patellar tendon moment arm: quantified in vivo during volitional activity.

Authors:  Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  [A novel knee endoprosthesis with a physiological joint shape. Part 1: Biomechanical basics and tribological studies].

Authors:  K-H Frosch; T Floerkemeier; C Abicht; P Adam; H Dathe; J Fanghänel; K M Stürmer; D Kubein-Meesenburg; H Nägerl
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Changes in knee kinematics reflect the articular geometry after arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anthony M J Bull; Oliver Kessler; Mahbub Alam; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Lateral uni-compartmental knee replacement: current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  E Servien; A Merini; S Lustig; P Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Improved kinematics of total knee replacement following partially navigated modified gap-balancing technique.

Authors:  Clemens Baier; Wolfgang Fitz; Ben Craiovan; Armin Keshmiri; Sebastian Winkler; Robert Springorum; Joachim Grifka; Johannes Beckmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  A new spacer-guided, PCL balancing technique for cruciate-retaining total knee replacement.

Authors:  P J C Heesterbeek; L Labey; P Wong; B Innocenti; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Optimisation of the posterior stabilised tibial post for greater femoral rollback after total knee arthroplasty--a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Nagarajan Chandran; Farid Amirouche; Mark H Gonzalez; Kevin M Hilton; Riad Barmada; Wayne Goldstein
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  [A new total knee arthroplasty with physiologically shaped surfaces. Part 2: First clinical results].

Authors:  K-H Frosch; H Nägerl; D Kubein-Meesenburg; J Buchholz; J Dörner; H Dathe; O Hellerer; C Dumont; K M Stürmer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.