Literature DB >> 15328445

Postural responses exhibit multisensory dependencies with discordant visual and support surface motion.

Emily A Keshner1, Robert V Kenyon, Jessica Langston.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify how the postural system weights coincident yet discordant disturbances of the visual and proprioceptive/vestibular systems. Eleven healthy subjects (25-38 yrs) received either fore-aft translations of an immersive, wide field-of-view visual environment (0.1 Hz, +/- 3.7 m/sec), or anterior-posterior translations of the support surface (0.25 Hz, +/- 15 cm/sec), or both concurrently. Kinematics of the head, trunk, and shank were collected with an Optotrak system and angular motion of each segment plotted across time. With only support surface translation, segmental responses were small (1 degrees -2 degrees ) and mostly opposed the direction of sled translation. When only the visual scene was moving, segmental responses increased as the trial progressed. When the inputs were presented coincidentally, response amplitudes were large even at the onset of the trial. Mean RMS values across subjects were significantly greater with combined stimuli than for either stimulus presented alone and areas under the power curve across subjects were significantly increased at the frequency of the visual input when both inputs were presented. Thus, intra-modality dependencies were observed, such that responses to the visual inputs significantly increased and responses to the somatosensory signals reflected the stimulus amplitude only when the two inputs were combined. We believe it unlikely that the role of any single pathway contributing to postural control can be accurately characterized in a static environment if the function of that pathway is context dependent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15328445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  30 in total

1.  Do sensorial manipulations affect subjects differently depending on their postural abilities?

Authors:  Thierry Paillard; Riadh Bizid; Philippe Dupui
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Influence of Visual Dependence on Inter-Segmental Coordination during Upright Stance in Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Yawen Yu; Carole A Tucker; Richard T Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Characterizing head motion in three planes during combined visual and base of support disturbances in healthy and visually sensitive subjects.

Authors:  E A Keshner; Y Dhaher
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Neuromechanical tuning of nonlinear postural control dynamics.

Authors:  Lena H Ting; Keith W van Antwerp; Jevin E Scrivens; J Lucas McKay; Torrence D J Welch; Jeffrey T Bingham; Stephen P DeWeerth
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.642

5.  Identifying the control of physically and perceptually evoked sway responses with coincident visual scene velocities and tilt of the base of support.

Authors:  Yun Wang; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Emergence of virtual reality as a tool for upper limb rehabilitation: incorporation of motor control and motor learning principles.

Authors:  Mindy F Levin; Patrice L Weiss; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-09-11

7.  Visual motion combined with base of support width reveals variable field dependency in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Jefferson W Streepey; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Self versus environment motion in postural control.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 9.  Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review.

Authors:  Sergei V Adamovich; Gerard G Fluet; Eugene Tunik; Alma S Merians
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.138

10.  Reorientation to vertical modulated by combined support surface tilt and virtual visual flow in healthy elders and adults with stroke.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.