Literature DB >> 15328365

Comparative analysis of dioxin response elements in human, mouse and rat genomic sequences.

Y V Sun1, D R Boverhof, L D Burgoon, M R Fielden, T R Zacharewski.   

Abstract

Comparative approaches were used to identify human, mouse and rat dioxin response elements (DREs) in genomic sequences unambiguously assigned to a nucleotide RefSeq accession number. A total of 13 bona fide DREs, all including the substitution intolerant core sequence (GCGTG) and adjacent variable sequences, were used to establish a position weight matrix and a matrix similarity (MS) score threshold to rank identified DREs. DREs with MS scores above the threshold were disproportionately distributed in close proximity to the transcription start site in all three species. Gene expression assays in hepatic mouse tissue confirmed the responsiveness of 192 genes possessing a putative DRE. Previously identified functional DREs in well-characterized AhR-regulated genes including Cyp1a1 and Cyp1b1 were corroborated. Putative DREs were identified in 48 out of 2437 human-mouse-rat orthologous genes between -1500 and the transcriptional start site, of which 19 of these genes possessed positionally conserved DREs as determined by multiple sequence alignment. Seven of these nineteen genes exhibited 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-mediated regulation, although there were significant discrepancies between in vivo and in vitro results. Interestingly, of the mouse-rat orthologous genes with a DRE between -1500 and +1500, only 37% had an equivalent human ortholog. These results suggest that AhR-mediated gene expression may not be well conserved across species, which could have significant implications in human risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15328365      PMCID: PMC516056          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  65 in total

1.  TRANSFAC: an integrated system for gene expression regulation.

Authors:  E Wingender; X Chen; R Hehl; H Karas; I Liebich; V Matys; T Meinhardt; M Prüss; I Reuter; F Schacherer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Genome-wide location and function of DNA binding proteins.

Authors:  B Ren; F Robert; J J Wyrick; O Aparicio; E G Jennings; I Simon; J Zeitlinger; J Schreiber; N Hannett; E Kanin; T L Volkert; C J Wilson; S P Bell; R A Young
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers.

Authors:  S Rozen; H Skaletsky
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

Review 4.  Target gene identification from expression array data by promoter analysis.

Authors:  T Werner
Journal:  Biomol Eng       Date:  2001-03

5.  Differential transcriptional regulation of rat vasopressin gene expression by estrogen receptor alpha and beta.

Authors:  R A Shapiro; C Xu; D M Dorsa
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.736

6.  Conservation of DNA regulatory motifs and discovery of new motifs in microbial genomes.

Authors:  A M McGuire; J D Hughes; G M Church
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Protein-DNA interactions at a dioxin-responsive enhancer. Analysis of six bona fide DNA-binding sites for the liganded Ah receptor.

Authors:  A Lusska; E Shen; J P Whitlock
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-03-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Efp as a primary estrogen-responsive gene in human breast cancer.

Authors:  K Ikeda; A Orimo; Y Higashi; M Muramatsu; S Inoue
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2000-04-21       Impact factor: 4.124

9.  Molecular evolution of two vertebrate aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptors (AHR1 and AHR2) and the PAS family.

Authors:  M E Hahn; S I Karchner; M A Shapiro; S A Perera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Role of the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor and [Ah] gene battery in the oxidative stress response, cell cycle control, and apoptosis.

Authors:  D W Nebert; A L Roe; M Z Dieter; W A Solis; Y Yang; T P Dalton
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 5.858

View more
  74 in total

1.  2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-induced MUC5AC expression: aryl hydrocarbon receptor-independent/EGFR/ERK/p38-dependent SP1-based transcription.

Authors:  Yong C Lee; Karen L Oslund; Philip Thai; Sharlene Velichko; Tomoyuki Fujisawa; Trang Duong; Michael S Denison; Reen Wu
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 6.914

Review 2.  Discovery and verification of functional single nucleotide polymorphisms in regulatory genomic regions: current and developing technologies.

Authors:  Brian N Chorley; Xuting Wang; Michelle R Campbell; Gary S Pittman; Maher A Noureddine; Douglas A Bell
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-05-04       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  The transcription Factor AHR prevents the differentiation of a stage 3 innate lymphoid cell subset to natural killer cells.

Authors:  Tiffany Hughes; Edward L Briercheck; Aharon G Freud; Rossana Trotta; Susan McClory; Steven D Scoville; Karen Keller; Youcai Deng; Jordan Cole; Nicholas Harrison; Charlene Mao; Jianying Zhang; Don M Benson; Jianhua Yu; Michael A Caligiuri
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  Comparison of TCDD-elicited genome-wide hepatic gene expression in Sprague-Dawley rats and C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Rance Nault; Suntae Kim; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  CLARITY-BPA: Effects of chronic Bisphenol A exposure on the immune system: Part 1 - Quantification of the relative number and proportion of leukocyte populations in the spleen and thymus.

Authors:  Jinpeng Li; Anthony Bach; Robert B Crawford; Ashwini S Phadnis-Moghe; Weimin Chen; Shawna D'Ingillo; Natalia Kovalova; Jose E Suarez-Martinez; Jiajun Zhou; Barbara L F Kaplan; Norbert E Kaminski
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Involvement of Blimp-1 and AP-1 dysregulation in the 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-mediated suppression of the IgM response by B cells.

Authors:  Dina Schneider; Maria A Manzan; Byung Sun Yoo; Robert B Crawford; Norbert Kaminski
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  PCB153-elicited hepatic responses in the immature, ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice: comparative toxicogenomic effects of dioxin and non-dioxin-like ligands.

Authors:  Anna K Kopec; Lyle D Burgoon; Daher Ibrahim-Aibo; Bryan D Mets; Colleen Tashiro; Dave Potter; Bonnie Sharratt; Jack R Harkema; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 8.  Role of AhR in positive regulation of cell proliferation and survival.

Authors:  Jiuheng Yin; Baifa Sheng; Yuan Qiu; Kunqiu Yang; Weidong Xiao; Hua Yang
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2016-08-14       Impact factor: 6.831

9.  TCDD and a putative endogenous AhR ligand, ITE, elicit the same immediate changes in gene expression in mouse lung fibroblasts.

Authors:  Ellen C Henry; Stephen L Welle; Thomas A Gasiewicz
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Phenobarbital elicits unique, early changes in the expression of hepatic genes that affect critical pathways in tumor-prone B6C3F1 mice.

Authors:  Jennifer M Phillips; Lyle D Burgoon; Jay I Goodman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.