Literature DB >> 11222983

Target gene identification from expression array data by promoter analysis.

T Werner1.   

Abstract

DNA microchips and expression arrays yield enormous amounts of data linking cDNA sequences to gene expression patterns. This now allows the characterization of gene expression in normal and diseased tissues as well as the response of tissues to the application of therapeutic reagents. Software currently exists to analyze DNA array/chip data with respect to corresponding mRNA sequences, which facilitates the precise determination of when and where certain groups of genes are expressed. The information concerning transcriptional regulatory networks responsible for the observed expression patterns is not contained within the cDNA sequences used to generate the arrays, but resides often within the promoter sequences of the individual genes (and/or enhancers). The complete sequence of the human genome will provide the molecular basis for the identification of such regulatory regions. Promoter sequences for specific cDNAs can be obtained reliably from genomic sequences simply by exon mapping. Promoter prediction tools can also be used to locate promoters directly in the genomic sequence in many cases in which cDNAs are 5'-incomplete. Once sufficient numbers of promoter sequences have been obtained, the comparative promoter analysis of the co-regulated genes and groups of genes can be applied in order to generate models describing the higher order levels of the transcription factor binding site organization within these promoter regions. As evident from several examples, this approach can identify promoter modules responsible for the common regulation of promoters solely by the application of bioinformatics methods. Such modules represent the molecular mechanisms through which regulatory networks influence gene expression. Another advantage of this approach is that it also provides a powerful alternative for elucidating functional features of genes with no detectable sequence similarity, by linking them to other genes on the basis of their common promoter structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11222983     DOI: 10.1016/s1389-0344(00)00071-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomol Eng        ISSN: 1389-0344


  8 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of dioxin response elements in human, mouse and rat genomic sequences.

Authors:  Y V Sun; D R Boverhof; L D Burgoon; M R Fielden; T R Zacharewski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Lipoxin A4 modifies platelet-derived growth factor-induced pro-fibrotic gene expression in human renal mesangial cells.

Authors:  Karen Rodgers; Blaithin McMahon; Derick Mitchell; Denise Sadlier; Catherine Godson
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 3.  Hox genes and their candidate downstream targets in the developing central nervous system.

Authors:  Z N Akin; A J Nazarali
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.046

4.  CD24 is an effector of HIF-1-driven primary tumor growth and metastasis.

Authors:  Shibu Thomas; Michael A Harding; Steven C Smith; Jonathan B Overdevest; Matthew D Nitz; Henry F Frierson; Scott A Tomlins; Glen Kristiansen; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  From single nucleotide polymorphism to transcriptional mechanism: a model for FRMD3 in diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Sebastian Martini; Viji Nair; Sanjeevkumar R Patel; Felix Eichinger; Robert G Nelson; E Jennifer Weil; Marcus G Pezzolesi; Andrzej S Krolewski; Ann Randolph; Benjamin J Keller; Thomas Werner; Matthias Kretzler
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 9.461

6.  In Silico Promoter Analysis can Predict Genes of Functional Relevance in Cell Proliferation: Validation in a Colon Cancer Model.

Authors:  Alan C Moss; Peter P Doran; Padraic Macmathuna
Journal:  Transl Oncogenomics       Date:  2007-02-14

7.  Bioinformatic interrogation of expression array data to identify nutritionally regulated genes potentially modulated by DNA methylation.

Authors:  J A McKay; M E Adriaens; D Ford; C L Relton; C T A Evelo; J C Mathers
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 5.523

8.  Revealing radiotherapy- and chemoradiation-induced pathway dynamics in glioblastoma by analyzing multiple differential networks.

Authors:  Jia Zhou; Chao Chen; Hua-Feng Li; Yu-Jie Hu; Hong-Ling Xie
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 2.952

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.