Literature DB >> 24349644

Screening and early diagnosis of osteoporosis through X-ray and ultrasound based techniques.

Paola Pisani1, Maria Daniela Renna1, Francesco Conversano1, Ernesto Casciaro1, Maurizio Muratore1, Eugenio Quarta1, Marco Di Paola1, Sergio Casciaro1.   

Abstract

Effective prevention and management of osteoporosis would require suitable methods for population screenings and early diagnosis. Current clinically-available diagnostic methods are mainly based on the use of either X-rays or ultrasound (US). All X-ray based methods provide a measure of bone mineral density (BMD), but it has been demonstrated that other structural aspects of the bone are important in determining fracture risk, such as mechanical features and elastic properties, which cannot be assessed using densitometric techniques. Among the most commonly used techniques, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is considered the current "gold standard" for osteoporosis diagnosis and fracture risk prediction. Unfortunately, as other X-ray based techniques, DXA has specific limitations (e.g., use of ionizing radiation, large size of the equipment, high costs, limited availability) that hinder its application for population screenings and primary care diagnosis. This has resulted in an increasing interest in developing reliable pre-screening tools for osteoporosis such as quantitative ultrasound (QUS) scanners, which do not involve ionizing radiation exposure and represent a cheaper solution exploiting portable and widely available devices. Furthermore, the usefulness of QUS techniques in fracture risk prediction has been proven and, with the last developments, they are also becoming a more and more reliable approach for assessing bone quality. However, the US assessment of osteoporosis is currently used only as a pre-screening tool, requiring a subsequent diagnosis confirmation by means of a DXA evaluation. Here we illustrate the state of art in the early diagnosis of this "silent disease" and show up recent advances for its prevention and improved management through early diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; Diagnosis of osteoporosis; Peripheral sites; Quantitative ultrasound; Screening techniques; X-ray based methods

Year:  2013        PMID: 24349644      PMCID: PMC3856332          DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i11.398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Radiol        ISSN: 1949-8470


  75 in total

1.  Prediction of hip fracture risk by quantitative ultrasound in more than 7000 Swiss women > or =70 years of age: comparison of three technologically different bone ultrasound devices in the SEMOF study.

Authors:  Marc-Antoine Krieg; Jacques Cornuz; Christiane Ruffieux; Guy Van Melle; Daniel Büche; Maximilian A Dambacher; Didier Hans; Florian Hartl; Hansjorg J Häuselmann; Marius Kraenzlin; Kurt Lippuner; Maurus Neff; Pierro Pancaldi; Rene Rizzoli; Franco Tanzi; Robert Theiler; Alan Tyndall; Claus Wimpfheimer; Peter Burckhardt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Quantitative ultrasound and hip fractures?

Authors:  Wojciech Pluskiewicz
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions.

Authors:  Klaus Engelke; Judith E Adams; Gabriele Armbrecht; Peter Augat; Cesar E Bogado; Mary L Bouxsein; Dieter Felsenberg; Masako Ito; Sven Prevrhal; Didier B Hans; E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Age-related patterns of trabecular and cortical bone loss differ between sexes and skeletal sites: a population-based HR-pQCT study.

Authors:  Heather M Macdonald; Kyle K Nishiyama; Jian Kang; David A Hanley; Steven K Boyd
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Reliability and accuracy of vertebral fracture assessment with densitometry compared to radiography in clinical practice.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; C Rowan Debold
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Long-term precision of DXA scanning assessed over seven years in forty postmenopausal women.

Authors:  R Patel; G M Blake; J Rymer; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Reproducibility of phalanx osteosonography and relation with forearm peripheral quantitative computed tomography: single finger versus average measurement on the last four fingers.

Authors:  O Louis; X Moreels; M Osteaux
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  The apparent incidence of hip fracture in Europe: a study of national register sources.

Authors:  O Johnell; B Gullberg; E Allander; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Usefulness of bone quantitative ultrasound in management of osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  A Montagnani; S Gonnelli; C Cepollaro; M Mangeri; R Monaco; L Gennari; C Gennari
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Calcaneus ultrasound measurements in a convenience sample of healthy youth.

Authors:  A Sawyer; S Moore; K T Fielding; D A Nix; J Kiratli; L K Bachrach
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  37 in total

1.  Bone assessment via thermal photo-acoustic measurements.

Authors:  Ting Feng; Kenneth M Kozloff; Chao Tian; Joseph E Perosky; Yi-Sing Hsiao; Sidan Du; Jie Yuan; Cheri X Deng; Xueding Wang
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.776

2.  Evaluation of impact of steroid replacement treatment on bone health in children with 21-hydroxylase deficiency.

Authors:  M Delvecchio; L Soldano; A Lonero; A Ventura; P Giordano; L Cavallo; M Grano; G Brunetti; M F Faienza
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 3.  Optoacoustic imaging in endocrinology and metabolism.

Authors:  Angelos Karlas; Miguel A Pleitez; Juan Aguirre; Vasilis Ntziachristos
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Effect of gate choice on backscatter difference measurements of cancellous bone.

Authors:  Brent K Hoffmeister; Ann M Viano; Luke C Fairbanks; Sheldon C Ebron; Joseph A McPherson; Matthew T Huber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Osteoporosis: a discussion on the past 5 years.

Authors:  Kyle M Schweser; Brett D Crist
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

Review 6.  The role of sarcopenia in the risk of osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  A Oliveira; C Vaz
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 7.  Osteoporosis: what the clinician needs to know?

Authors:  Rosario Francesco Balzano; Maria Mattera; Xiaoguang Cheng; Samantha Cornacchia; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

8.  In vitro method for the screening and monitoring of estrogen-deficiency osteoporosis by targeting peripheral circulating monocytes.

Authors:  Francesca Salamanna; Melania Maglio; Gianluca Giavaresi; Stefania Pagani; Roberto Giardino; Milena Fini
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-08-07

9.  Characterization of bone microstructure using photoacoustic spectrum analysis.

Authors:  Ting Feng; Joseph E Perosky; Kenneth M Kozloff; Guan Xu; Qian Cheng; Sidan Du; Jie Yuan; Cheri X Deng; Xueding Wang
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 10.  New perspectives in echographic diagnosis of osteoporosis on hip and spine.

Authors:  Sergio Casciaro; Francesco Conversano; Paola Pisani; Maurizio Muratore
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2015-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.