Literature DB >> 15310772

Randomized trial of a shared decision-making intervention consisting of trade-offs and individualized treatment information for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

M S van Roosmalen1, P F M Stalmeier, L C G Verhoef, J E H M Hoekstra-Weebers, J C Oosterwijk, N Hoogerbrugge, U Moog, W A J van Daal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a shared decision-making intervention (SDMI) for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who have to make a choice between screening and prophylactic surgery for breasts and/or ovaries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The SDMI consisted of two value assessment sessions, using the time trade-off method, followed by individualized treatment information based on (quality-adjusted) life expectancy. After the baseline assessment (2 weeks after a positive DNA test result), women were randomly assigned to the SDMI group (n = 44), receiving the SDMI 2 months after the test result, or to the control group (n = 44). The short- and long-term effects, 3 and 9 months after the test result, were assessed using questionnaires. Data were collected on well-being, treatment choice, and decision-related outcomes.
RESULTS: In the short term, the SDMI had no effect. In the long term, with respect to well-being, patients in the SDMI group had less intrusive thoughts (P =.05) and better general health (P =.01) and tended to be less depressed (P =.07). With respect to decision-related outcomes for the breasts, the SDMI group held stronger preferences (P =.02) and agreed more strongly to having weighed the pros and cons (P =.01). No effect was found on treatment choice. In the long term, interaction effects between the SDMI and cancer history were found. The SDMI showed an overall beneficial effect for unaffected women, whereas affected women tended to experience detrimental effects.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that the SDMI improved decision making in unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Supporting decision making in a systematic way using trade-offs is beneficial for these women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15310772     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  35 in total

1.  Distinctive psychological and social experiences of women choosing prophylactic oophorectomy for cancer prevention.

Authors:  Rachel Meadows; Tasleem J Padamsee; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2018-02-02

2.  Longitudinal changes in patient distress following interactive decision aid use among BRCA1/2 carriers: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Gillian W Hooker; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Tiffani DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Clinton Finch; Erica Wahl; Jessica Rispoli Joines; Karen Brown; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  The relationship of nondirectiveness to genetic counseling: report of a workshop at the 2003 NSGC Annual Education Conference.

Authors:  Jon Weil; Kelly Ormond; June Peters; Kathryn Peters; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Bonnie LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Enhanced counselling for women undergoing BRCA1/2 testing: Impact on knowledge and psychological distress-results from a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Kerry Anne Sherman; Suzanne Miller; Joanne Buzaglo; Mary Daly; Alan Taylor; Eric Ross; Andrew Godwin
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-04

Review 5.  Outcome-Relevant Effects of Shared Decision Making.

Authors:  Katarina Hauser; Armin Koerfer; Kathrin Kuhr; Christian Albus; Stefan Herzig; Jan Matthes
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Does implementing a development plan for user participation in a mental hospital change patients' experience? A non-randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Marit B Rise; Aslak Steinsbekk
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  The role of doctor's opinion in shared decision making: what does shared decision making really mean when considering invasive medical procedures?

Authors:  Dennis J Mazur; David H Hickam; Marcus D Mazur; Matthew D Mazur
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Development and evaluation of a decision aid for BRCA carriers with breast cancer.

Authors:  Julie O Culver; Deborah J MacDonald; Andrea A Thornton; Sharon R Sand; Marcia Grant; Deborah J Bowen; Harry Burke; Nellie Garcia; Kelly A Metcalfe; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Randomized trial of a decision aid for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: impact on measures of decision making and satisfaction.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; William Lawrence; Jessica Rispoli; Karen Brown; Claudine Isaacs; Suzanne O'Neill; Rebecca Shelby; Sherry C Grumet; Margaret M McGovern; Sarah Garnett; Heather Bremer; Suzanne Leaman; Kathryn O'Mara; Sarah Kelleher; Kathryn Komaridis
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  Distress among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 results: 12-month outcomes.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Christine Rini; Rachel E Goldsmith; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Lawrence H Cohen; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.