Literature DB >> 31182593

Consistency between individuals' past and current romantic partners' own reports of their personalities.

Yoobin Park1, Geoff MacDonald2.   

Abstract

Do people have a "type" when it comes to their romantic partners' personalities? In the present research, we used data from a 9-y longitudinal study in Germany and examined the similarity between an individual's ex- and current partners using the partners' self-reported personality profiles. Based on the social accuracy model, our analyses distinguished similarity between partners that was attributable to similarity to an average person (normative similarity) and resemblance to the target participant himself/herself (self-partner similarity) to more precisely examine similarity from partner to partner (distinctive similarity). The results revealed a significant degree of distinctive partner similarity, suggesting that there may indeed be a unique type of person each individual ends up with. We also found that distinctive partner similarity was weaker for people high in extraversion or openness to experience, suggesting that these individuals may be less likely to be in a relationship with someone similar to their ex-partner (although the individual difference effects were not mirrored in an alternative analytic approach). These findings provide evidence for stability in distinctive partner personality and have important implications for predicting future partnering behaviors and actions in romantic relationships.

Entities:  

Keywords:  partner personality; partnering patterns; romantic relationships

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31182593      PMCID: PMC6600925          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1902937116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  17 in total

1.  The Social Accuracy Model of Interpersonal Perception: Assessing Individual Differences in Perceptive and Expressive Accuracy.

Authors:  Jeremy C Biesanz
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Ideal mate personality concepts and compatibility in close relationships: a longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Marcel R Zentner
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-08

Review 3.  Marriage and health: his and hers.

Authors:  J K Kiecolt-Glaser; T L Newton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations.

Authors:  Andrew Gelman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  The Correlates of Similarity Estimates Are Often Misleadingly Positive: The Nature and Scope of the Problem, and Some Solutions.

Authors:  Dustin Wood; R Michael Furr
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-04-20

6.  Through the looking glass clearly: accuracy and assumed similarity in well-adjusted individuals' first impressions.

Authors:  Lauren J Human; Jeremy C Biesanz
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-02

Review 7.  The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paul W Eastwick; Laura B Luchies; Eli J Finkel; Lucy L Hunt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Learning from the past, altering the future: a tentative theory of the effect of past relationships on couples who remarry.

Authors:  Andrew Brimhall; Karen Wampler; Thomas Kimball
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2008-09

9.  Adult baby/diaper lovers: an exploratory study of an online community sample.

Authors:  Kaitlyn Hawkinson; Brian D Zamboni
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2014-01-29

10.  Sexual imprinting in human mate choice.

Authors:  Tamas Bereczkei; Petra Gyuris; Glenn E Weisfeld
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.