Literature DB >> 15296007

External and internal limitations in amplitude-modulation processing.

Stephan D Ewert1, Torsten Dau.   

Abstract

Three experiments are presented to explore the relative role of "external" signal variability and "internal" resolution limitations of the auditory system in the detection and discrimination of amplitude modulations (AM). In the first experiment, AM-depth discrimination performance was determined using sinusoidally modulated broadband-noise and pure-tone carriers. The AM index, m, of the standard ranged from -28 to -3 dB (expressed as 20 log m). AM-depth discrimination thresholds were found to be a fraction of the AM depth of the standard for standards down to -18 dB, in the case of the pure-tone carrier, and down to -8 dB, in the case of the broadband-noise carrier. For smaller standards, AM-depth discrimination required a fixed increase in AM depth, independent of the AM depth of the standard. In the second experiment, AM-detection thresholds were obtained for signal-modulation frequencies of 4, 16, 64, and 256 Hz, applied to either a band-limited random-noise carrier or a deterministic ("frozen") noise carrier, as a function of carrier bandwidth (8 to 2048 Hz). In general, detection thresholds were higher for the random- than for the frozen-noise carriers. For both carrier types, thresholds followed the pattern expected from frequency-selective processing of the stimulus envelope. The third experiment investigated AM masking at 4, 16, and 64 Hz in the presence of a narrow-band masker modulation. The variability of the masker was changed from entirely frozen to entirely random, while the long-term average envelope power spectrum was held constant. The experiment examined the validity of a long-term average quantity as the decision variable, and the role of memory in experiments with frozen-noise maskers. The empirical results were compared to predictions obtained with two modulation-filterbank models. The predictions revealed that AM-depth discrimination and AM detection are limited by a combination of the external signal variability and an internal "Weber-fraction" noise process.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15296007     DOI: 10.1121/1.1737399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  The effect of carrier level on tuning in amplitude-modulation masking.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Coding of amplitude modulation in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Pingbo Yin; Jeffrey S Johnson; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The effect of narrow-band noise maskers on increment detection.

Authors:  Jessica J Messersmith; Harisadhan Patra; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Gap detection in school-age children and adults: effects of inherent envelope modulation and the availability of cues across frequency.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; Heather Porter; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Cues for masked amplitude-modulation detection.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Neural rate and timing cues for detection and discrimination of amplitude-modulated tones in the awake rabbit inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Comparison of level discrimination, increment detection, and comodulation masking release in the audio- and envelope-frequency domains.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Stephan D Ewert; Laurel H Carney; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Discrimination of starting phase with sinusoidal envelope modulation.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Influences of modulation and spatial separation on detection of a masked broadband target.

Authors:  Norbert Kopco; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Modulation-frequency-specific adaptation in awake auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Ralph E Beitel; Maike Vollmer; Marc A Heiser; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.