Literature DB >> 29582107

Effects of stimulus pair orientation and hand switching on reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transfer.

Yanick Leblanc-Sirois1, Claude M J Braun2, Jonathan Elie-Fortier2.   

Abstract

Two behavioral estimates of interhemispheric transfer time, the crossed-uncrossed difference (CUD) and the unilateral field advantage (UFA), are thought to, respectively, index transfer of premotor and visual information across the corpus callosum in neurotypical participants. However, no attempt to manipulate visual and motor contingencies in a set of tasks while measuring the CUD and the UFA has yet been reported. In two go/no-go comparison experiments, stimulus pair orientations were manipulated. The hand of response changed after each correct response in the second, but not the first experiment. No correlation was found between the CUD and the UFA, supporting the hypothesis that these two measures index different types of information transfer across hemispheres. An effect of manipulation of stimulus pair orientation on UFAs was attributed to the homotopy of callosal fibers transferring visual information, while an effect of hand switching on CUDs was attributed mostly to spatial compatibility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Callosal homotopy.; Crossed-uncrossed difference; Interhemispheric transfer time; Unilateral-bilateral field advantage

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29582107     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5243-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Evidence for interhemispheric motor-level transfer in a simple reaction time task: an EEG study.

Authors:  G Thut; C A Hauert; S Morand; M Seeck; T Landis; C Michel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Refutation of Poffenberger's inference: an existence proof and a countermodel.

Authors:  C Larocque; A Achim; C M Braun
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2001 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  The divided visual field paradigm: methodological considerations.

Authors:  Victoria J Bourne
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2006-07

Review 4.  Estimation of interhemispheric dynamics from simple unimanual reaction time to extrafoveal stimuli.

Authors:  C M Braun
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Spatial stimulus-response compatibility in callosotomy patients and subjects with callosal agenesis.

Authors:  S Aglioti; G Tassinari; G Berlucchi
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Interhemispheric interaction: how do the hemispheres divide and conquer a task?

Authors:  M T Banich; A Belger
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Inter-hemispheric dynamics revealed by reaction time in the Dimond paradigm.

Authors:  Yanick Leblanc-Sirois; Claude M J Braun
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 8.  Intra and inter hemispheric dynamics revealed by reaction time in the Dimond paradigm: a quantitative review of the literature.

Authors:  Yanick Leblanc-Sirois; Claude M J Braun
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Simple reaction times of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized visual stimuli.

Authors:  G Berlucchi; W Heron; R Hyman; G Rizzolatti; C Umiltà
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Interhemispheric transfer following callosotomy in humans: role of the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Silvia Savazzi; Mara Fabri; Guido Rubboli; Aldo Paggi; Carlo Alberto Tassinari; Carlo Alberto Marzi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-04-08       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.