Literature DB >> 7840884

Left-right asymmetry of callosal transfer in normal human subjects.

P Bisiacchi1, C A Marzi, R Nicoletti, G Carena, C Mucignat, F Tomaiuolo.   

Abstract

Interhemispheric transfer (IT) of visuomotor information can be assessed by measuring the crossed-uncrossed difference (CUD) in the Poffenberger paradigm [14]. We report a series of experiments aimed at casting light on two aspects of IT: the importance of motor response variables and the nature of the left-right asymmetries found in a recent meta-analysis of studies using the Poffenberger paradigm [10]. In Experiments 1 and 2 we found no effect of varying the finger used for response while there was a larger CUD when using the left hand in comparison to the right hand. In Experiment 3, which employed visual stimuli different from the two preceding experiments, CUD asymmetries were related to hemifields rather than to hands with a CUD larger for the right than for the left visual hemifield. These findings suggests that both motor and visual variables are important for CUD asymmetries to occur and are in keeping with a horse race model according to which overall speed of IT is determined by whichever signal (visual or pre-motor) is more rapid in crossing from one side to the other. As to the issue of lateral asymmetries in the CUD, the results of Expt. 3 have also shown that asymmetries arise only in tasks requiring an IT and therefore cannot depend upon additive hemispheric effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7840884     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(94)90129-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Attentional and intentional cueing in a Simon task: an EEG-based approach.

Authors:  Edmund Wascher; M Wolber
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-05-15

2.  Experimental disentangling of spatial-compatibility and interhemispheric-relay effects in simple reaction time (Poffenberger paradigm).

Authors:  Claude M J Braun; Caroline Larocque; André Achim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual and tactile interhemispheric transfer compared with the method of Poffenberger.

Authors:  Robert Fendrich; Jeffrey J Hutsler; Michael S Gazzaniga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Low frequency fluctuations reveal integrated and segregated processing among the cerebral hemispheres.

Authors:  Dylan G Gee; Bharat B Biswal; Clare Kelly; David E Stark; Daniel S Margulies; Zarrar Shehzad; Lucina Q Uddin; Donald F Klein; Marie T Banich; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Handedness and Asymmetry of Motor Skill Learning in Right-handers.

Authors:  Jinwhan Cho; Kyung-Seok Park; Manho Kim; Seong-Ho Park
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 3.077

6.  Behavioral estimates of interhemispheric transmission time and the signal detection method: a reappraisal.

Authors:  M Brysbaert
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-10

7.  Reciprocal organization of the cerebral hemispheres.

Authors:  Iain McGilchrist
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.986

8.  Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time.

Authors:  David L Woods; John M Wyma; E William Yund; Timothy J Herron; Bruce Reed
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A greater involvement of posterior brain areas in interhemispheric transfer in autism: fMRI, DWI and behavioral evidences.

Authors:  Elise B Barbeau; John D Lewis; Julien Doyon; Habib Benali; Thomas A Zeffiro; Laurent Mottron
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Inter-hemispheric integration of tactile-motor responses across body parts.

Authors:  Luigi Tamè; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.