Literature DB >> 15280183

An overview of the status of imaging screening technology for breast cancer.

J A Smith1, E Andreopoulou.   

Abstract

With breast cancer incidence rates showing no signs of abating, advances in risk stratification and increasing awareness of cancer control, there is interest in expanding the breast imaging arsenal. Mammography is still the standard of care, and a recent meta-analysis of seven large studies supports its value as a screening tool. There is, however, clear need for improved sensitivity and specificity. Imaging of function, metabolism and molecular activity in breast tissue is of potential benefit in addressing these issues. In this article we provide an overview of the current methods of imaging in breast cancer, including mammography, ultrasound, digital mammography, magnetic resonance, positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Screening and surveillance should, ideally, be tailored to an individual's cancer risk and breast tissue. Current evidence questions the recent move toward magnetic resonance imaging as a single or multimodality strategy for breast cancer screening. In a high-risk group, the cost effectiveness of technical innovations may be justified. Copyright 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15280183     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  14 in total

Review 1.  Technology as a force for improved diagnosis and treatment of breast disease.

Authors:  Claire M B Holloway; Alexandra Easson; Jaime Escallon; Wey Liang Leong; May Lynn Quan; Michael Reedjik; Frances C Wright; David R McCready
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Is whole-body FDG-PET valuable for health screening? Against.

Authors:  Matthias Weckesser; Otmar Schober
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  High-resolution spiral CT of the breast at very low dose: concept and feasibility considerations.

Authors:  Willi A Kalender; Marcel Beister; John M Boone; Daniel Kolditz; Sabrina V Vollmar; Michaela C C Weigel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Quantitative assessment of soft tissue deformation using digital speckle pattern interferometry: studies on phantom breast models.

Authors:  Udayakumar Karuppanan; Sujatha Narayanan Unni; Ganesan R Angarai
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-02-01

5.  Proteomic Profiling of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) using Magnetic Beads-based Serum Fractionation and MALDI-TOF MS.

Authors:  Juan Yang; Jiang Zhu; Kang He; Ling-Yu Zhao; Li-Ying Liu; Tu-Sheng Song; Chen Huang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  Bisphosphonate-functionalized gold nanoparticles for contrast-enhanced X-ray detection of breast microcalcifications.

Authors:  Lisa E Cole; Tracy Vargo-Gogola; Ryan K Roeder
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Role of Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Pankaj Kumar Garg; Suryanarayana V S Deo; Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-02

8.  Molecular photoacoustic tomography of breast cancer using receptor targeted magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as contrast agents.

Authors:  Lei Xi; Stephen R Grobmyer; Guangyin Zhou; Weiping Qian; Lily Yang; Huabei Jiang
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.207

Review 9.  Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review.

Authors:  Monika Nothacker; Volker Duda; Markus Hahn; Mathias Warm; Friedrich Degenhardt; Helmut Madjar; Susanne Weinbrenner; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Native human autoantibodies targeting GIPC1 identify differential expression in malignant tumors of the breast and ovary.

Authors:  Victoria Yavelsky; Sarit Rohkin; Ruthy Shaco-Levy; Alina Tzikinovsky; Tamar Amir; Hila Kohn; Berta Delgado; Alex Rabinovich; Benjamin Piura; Gerald Chan; Gavreel Kalantarov; Ilya Trakht; Leslie Lobel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.